Separate analyses revealed that the effect of Condition was highly significant in L1 ( F (1, 1939.5) = 23.8, p < 0.001), but there was no such effect in L2 ( F (1, 1939.5) = 1.35, p = 0.246).
Excerpts
The Insomnia Index yielded a highly significant difference among the shifts (p = 0.001).
They indicate a significant variation in WQI between water types with a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001) for RWW.
Additionally, although both ABSI and BMI increased gradually with deterioration in CKD, the strength of an increasing trend in ABSI (SS = 6.48, p < 0.001) was comparable to that of BMI (SS = 6.38, p < 0.001) in male participants, and was 27.6% and 44.1% higher with ABSI in overall and female participants, respectively, compared with BMI ( Table 2 ).
As expected, there was a highly significant difference between the two groups in AQ ( t (36) = 7.9, p < 0.001).
Senior Executive) was highly significant ( z = −5.61, p < 0.001), whereas the same pairwise comparison at three Triad talents did not reach significance ( z = 1.24, p = 0.21).
Our results ( Table 3 ) revealed that there was a highly significant difference in total time spent in sedentary activity ( p < 0.001) and in the total sedentary activity counts ( p < 0.001) in the control group compared with the ASD group.
burnetii antibodies gradually decreased after the outbreak, from 2.1% in 2010 to 1.4% in 2015, with a significant trend in time (p < 0.001).
The difference was regarded as significant when P < 0.05 (significant), P < 0.01 (moderately significant) and P < 0.001 (highly significant).
This was accompanied by a highly significant (p < 0.001) interaction between grand-maternal diet and age upon phosphorylation of Akt (pAkt ser473 ).
The sample adequacy for factor analysis resulted in a value of 0.834, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity resulted in a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.001).
When this categorical data is analyzed we find a highly significant relationship between types of studio audience and field study OAR co-occurring, χ 2 (2,306) = 27.790, p < 0.001, with a moderately strong relationship (Cramer’s V = 0.301).
Chelation therapy was universally applied in thalassemia major patients (100%), while only 17.4% of sickle cell anemia patients underwent this treatment, a highly significant difference (χ 2 = 35.801, p < 0.001) ( Table 1 ).
Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed a highly significant separation in overall survival between the two groups (P < 0.001), demonstrating that the RSF-based risk model has robust discriminatory ability for predicting survival outcomes in DLBCL ( Figure 2G ; Supplementary Figures S2H-J ).
However, between diagnosis and WPOI, there was a highly significant association ( P < 0.001) [ Figure 2 ].
The most comprehensive model, incorporating all three factors (age, WBC, and D-dimer), also yielded a highly significant AUC area of 0.723 ( p < 0.001).
All the indices indicated a good fit to the data (CFI = 0.960; TLI = 0.951; SRMR = 0.044; RMSEA = 0.046) and the structural coefficients were highly significant ( P < 0.001) (Additional files 7 and 8 ).
The pooled effect size is SMD = −0.60 (95% CI: −0.74 to −0.47), and the intervention effect has a highly significant statistical meaning (z = −8.63, p < 0.001). 4.1.2.
A highly significant difference of the ES distributions between these two groups was observed ( p < 0.001).
Co-treatment with 50 μM Monastrol and ascorbic acid almost completely abolished myelination (26.2 ± 19.2 MBP + segments/mm 2 ), showing a highly significant reduction compared to ascorbic acid alone ( p -value < 0.001), but not when compared to untreated controls with a p -value = 0.08 ( Figure S2B,C ).
There was also a highly significant difference in HbA1c between LH+ and LH− subjects, 9.61 vs 8.85, respectively ( p < 0.001).
Instead, having the models trained on ground truth data led to highly significant ( p < 0.001) improvements across all model types: −261 ms for LR, −280 ms for CNN and −355 ms for RNN.
A significant trend ( p < 0.001) was observed across all models, indicating a dose-response relationship between BRI and sarcopenia risk.
Remarkable improvement was seen in BRS, which showed a highly significant group effect ( p < .001), time effect ( p < .001), and interaction effects ( p < .001), with the large effect size ( η 2 = 0.291) as shown in Table 5 .
It can be reported that the electrical resistance was influenced by cyclic straining, which was highly significant at α = 0.05 level-value for the slope and intercept ( p -value < 0.001) (statistically significant).