A similar pattern was observed for progesterone receptor (PR) expression, with the exception that SNP rs676256 also showed a nominally significant association with PR-negative tumours (OR = 0.95 [0.91–0.98], P = 0.002; Table 2 ).
Excerpts
In addition, in the quartiles cases the MGMT was highly significant prognostic parameter with a Log-Rank test of p=0.002 and a Wilcoxon test of p=0.001.
The highly significant lower TT genotype was observed in male cases (4.8%) compared to that in male controls (13.7% Table 2 , TT vs CT: OR, 4.0, 95% CI, 1.646–9.720, P =0.002; TT vs CC: OR, 2.574, 95% CI, 1.063–6.237, P =0.018).
When we analyzed the alleles separately, we found a highly significant difference in LB number between donors carrying an ε 4 allele and donors not carrying this allele ( P = 0.002).
failed to reach significancep = .002
By contrast, gender was not significantly associated with Cluster 1, χ 2 (1) = 5.58, p = .02, and failed to reach significance for Cluster 3, χ 2 (1) = 9.41, p = .002.
A statistical comparison of categorical data for staining intensity for normal breast, DCIS and IBC and a similar analysis of categorical data for area stained for normal breast, DCIS and IBC showed that there is a highly significant decrease in the percentage of nuclei stained for PRH ( P =2 × 10 −3 ) and decreased nuclear staining intensity ( P =2 × 10 −4 ) in tumours compared with normal breast tissue and a trend towards increased cytoplasmic staining.
In the atropine group, the mean NFV recovery was lower than at baseline at day‐3 (−2.7 [4.3] ∆, p = 0.10), but this did not reach statistical significance until day‐10 (−6.8 [5.7] ∆, p = 0.002).
Total CSF and secondary CSF glycosylation demonstrated highly significant associations with decreased levels of t‐tau (p < 0.002; p < 0.02 respectively) and p‐Tau181 (p< 0.006; p<0.02 respectively) over a 10‐year period.
As expected, the forwards had a substantially larger body mass than the back line, with highly significant differences observed in height, weight and measures of neck and chest circumference (p < 0.002).
However, in the case of female subjects increased prevalence of CT genotype in patient was highly significant ( p = .002).
In cases of CME without SRF, there was a highly significant negative correlation between the duration and CC flow (in the 6 × 6 scans, r = −0.844, p = 0.002).
After long storage difference in the yield of IS and GA was highly significant ( P = 0.002).
The only exception was a highly significant PLVD as well as a statistically significant TLVD differences were found with respect to tumor grade (p = 0.002, p = 0.028) respectively (table 2 ).
Results Mitochondrial effects We observed that incubation with phenalenone F134 induced a highly significant decrease of the ATP level of L. amazonensis promastigotes ( F (6, 20) = 10.504, P = 0.002).
The expectations toward an ideal e-mental health app were not related to the age of the participants, except in the factor transparency in the group of the patients: The older the patient, the more emphasis he or she put on the opinion that an ideal e-mental health app should be transparent (ie, clear who designed the app, scientific evidence, etc) with a highly significant association ( r =.35, P =.002; experts: r =–0.01, P =.88; students: r =–0.02, P =.87).
For the species analysis along with the explanatory variables the unrestricted Monte Carlo permutation tests (499 permutations) of the significance of the canonical axes indicate axis 1 as statistically highly significant (p = 0.002).
Anemia Among women, the trend over the 4 iron perception categories (none, a little, a medium amount, a lot) to anemia was highly significant ( P = 0.002).
Highly significant differences emerged, however, between the median values of healthcare professionals’ perceptions of overcrowding ( p = 0.002).
Critically, the interaction between these two effects—which controls for the nonspecific factors that are not well matched between the first and the second trainings—was highly significant as reported above ( F (1,23) = 11.52, P = 0.002, η 2 = 0.334).
Post hoc Mann–Whitney tests showed highly significant differences between normotensive controls and women with either GH ( P =0.002) and preeclampsia ( P <0.0001).
Individuals that heard predator vocalizations 7 days previously demonstrated a highly significant (Fig. 2a ; F 1,8 = 21.0, P = 0.002), 48% greater level of ΔFosB immunoreactivity (positive cells/mm 2 ) in the amygdala than did those that heard non-predator vocalizations 7 days previously, as well as a highly significant (Fig. 2b ; F 1,8 = 12.1, P = 0.008), 42% greater level of ΔFosB immunoreactivity in the hippocampus (n = 6 predator and 6 non-predator individuals).
As shown in Fig 2(B) , there was a highly significant correlation between reaction time and the mean voltage N270(r = -0.325. p = 0.002).
Highly significant differences were observed for mortality, discharge to rehabilitation or nursing facility, cardiac complications, and pneumonia (all P ≤ 0.002).
showed a trendp =0.002
The Wilcoxon signed rank test was not significant ( p =0.086), but showed a trend pointing into the same direction as the parametric mixed-effects model, which compares mean values ( p =0.002).
The power law (Equation (2)) fitted to the descending segment of l was highly significant ( F 1,36 = 10.84, P = 0.002, R 2 = 0.583, lack of fit with F 7,29 = 1.14, P = 0.366).