Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
(2) Correlation analysis after multivariable adjustment revealed that the LA minimal volume index (LAVImin) increased with the progression of DN, while the absolute value of the LA strain index(reservoir and conduit period) decreased as renal damage worsened, exhibiting a highly significant correlation with the GFR ( P < 0.01).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
ANOVA ANOVA showed highly significant ( p < 0.01) differences among barley accessions for days to heading, days to maturity, plant height, peduncle length, spike length, number of spikelets per spike, number of kernels per spike, weight of kernels per spike, thousand kernel weight, and grain yield.
nominally significantP = 0.010.2× alphagold
Interestingly, a recent analysis of WES data from the UK Biobank ( 43 ) identified a nominally significant gene-based association ( P = 0.01, sequence kernel association test [SKAT]) for THBS1 rare coding variants and POAG (ICD-10 diagnosis code H40), suggesting that further study of rare THBS1 -coding variants in adult-onset POAG might be of interest.
highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The selection of extracted maxillary central incisor, vertical mounting of the tooth into self-cure acrylic resin using Ney surveyor was done according to standardization as stated by Stappert et al .[ 11 , 12 ] Group I versus Group II, (conventional technique versus CAD/CAM technique) showed that there was a statistically highly significant difference seen for the values between the Groups I versus II ( P < 0.01) with higher values for Group II as compared to Group I.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical Analysis The statistical estimation of the significance of the results obtained in the trials was performed using the ANOVA test, in which the objective was to compare the means between the control and treated groups, establishing significant probability values ( p ) < 0.05 [ 99 ] and considering the highly significant values of p < 0.01.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of larval mortality revealed that epidermal infection led to an earlier onset of host death and a higher mortality rate, with highly significant differences in the survival curves ( p < 0.01) among the two infection methods and the control ( Figure 6 B).
extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
Memory B cells, follicular helper T cells, M0 macrophages, M1 macrophages, M2 macrophages, resting mast cells, activated mast cells, plasma cells, and activated NK cells with extremely significant differences between NPC and NCNT ( p < 0.01, Figure 1(c) ) were selected for the following WGCNA analysis. 3.2.