Excerpts

For intestinal fluid at odorant pH 8.2, differences between the slopes of control and high CO 2 fish were highly significant ( F 44 = 8.15, p < 0.01); it was therefore not possible to compare the intercepts ( Figure 5C ).

Treatment effects were highly significant ( P < 0.01) on all variables except for the significant ( P < 0.05) effects on lip region width and median bulb width.

When allele frequencies were compared between cases and controls (Table 3 ), haplogroup X showed a trend toward greater disease risk (p = 0.01); however, this association was not significant after controlling for multiple testing (even when only considering testing each of the ten haplogroups separately (rather than in combinations), which requires a Bonferroni correction of alpha = 0.005).

aga and Hayashi (3). bGroup A: apparently healthy infants delivered from mothers not in- gesting PCB-contaminated rice oil during pregnancy; Group B: chil- dren born to mothers who consumed PCB-contaminated rice oil during pregnancy but showing no FPS at birth; Group C: children with FPS. "Highly significant p value differences (p < 0.01). *Significant differences (p < 0.05). between female FPS and female non-FPS infants in Nagaskaki (3) (Table 4).

Compared with the control group, PRRSV N protein in the treatment groups with 20 μg/ml and 40 μg/ml GCP shows a highly significant reduction ( P < 0.01).

This corresponds to an approximately four-fold increase relative to CIP, however, this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.01).

The VPT for age groups 40–49 and 50–59 years were significantly not different from each other, ANOVA F (3, 387) = 11.9, P < 0.01 with Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison test ( Table 3 ) .

A probability value less than 0.05 was considered significant (P < 0.05), and less than 0.01 was considered highly significant (P < 0.01).

At 3 dpf, there was a highly significant reduction in the birefringence of trg mutants to 45±2% of that of siblings, which persisted through to 6 dpf ( P <0.01, n =3) ( Fig. 1C ).

Ligilactobacillus showed a highly significant negative correlation with IgM levels in the serum and TLR2 mRNA expression level ( P < 0.01 , Fig. 7 ); Ligilactobacillus showed a negative correlation with CRP, TGF-β , and IL-β levels ( P < 0.05); Lactobacillus salivarius showed a highly significant positive correlation with body weight ( P < 0.01) and a highly significant negative correlation with the F/G, ET, MPO, and zonulin levels ( P < 0.01).

A highly significant association ( P < 0.01) of sex, BMI, systolic BP, family history of hypertension, and birth weight with diastolic BP was seen.

There was a highly significant interaction effect between seed treatment and variety on β-amylase activity (P < 0.01).

The difference in the decisive SIG values for the tumor subjects compared to their contralateral hemisphere are highly significant ( P < 0.01) in the regions of the brain, where there was a high incidence of tumor (glioma/meningioma).

Furthermore, this combined treatment achieved a reduction greater than 102 CFU/mL relative to either agent administered alone, exhibiting a highly significant difference ( P < 0.01). 3.3.3 Using drug combination for removing bacterial biofilms on rubber surfaces On rubber surfaces, the combination of perillaldehyde (1 μL/mL) and domiphen (1 μg/mL) significantly reduced viable S. aureus biofilm counts by approximately 10 2 CFU/mL compared to the control ( Figure 3C , P< 0.01), corresponding to a 30.13% eradication efficiency.

As the 2F1 component originates from the second-order retinal neurons, we have used this parameter in our statistical tests, and find the difference between the unmasked TH > G2019S and TH/+ is highly significant at P < 0.01.

Importantly, the ranking provided by the sensitivity analysis was trustworthy, since the linear regression explained most of the model output variability (R 2 = 0.91), and it was highly significant (F-statistic = 224, p<0.01).

All data were expressed as mean ± SD and analysed using One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range tests, Dunnett’ s T tests and Student’s T-tests (SPSS Statistics 18.0) to estimate the statistical differences of mean levels among the groups with statistically significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

A clear trend was observed towards lower PR-104A EC 50 values for cells with higher AKR1C3 activity ( Fig 4C , R 2 = 0.7063; p < 0.01).

In the final main-effects-only model, binocular viewing emerged as a highly significant predictor (F = 376.69, P < 0.01), again with a 0.45 D advantage (95% CI = 0.41–0.50, P < 0.01; Fig. 1 ).

ROM improvement for the dominant shoulder was highly significant during WSEM consumption ( P < .01).

Differences were considered to be statistically significant when P < 0.05, and highly significant when P < 0.01.

Proteobacteria showed a highly significant positive correlation ( p < 0.01) with AP.

Though participants with abnormal duodenum findings had lower meridian energy, most of the differences did not reach statistical significance, except for the left small intestine meridian (28.91 versus 34.48, mean difference = −5.56, P < .01) and the left pericardium meridian (25.83 versus 29.89, mean difference = −4.05, P < .05). 4.

Also, Pavithra Narasimhan 2018 stated that a similar result of our study, which showed Self – concept (138.290 ± 20.7750) and Achievement motivation (30.530 ± 7.3601) at the same time controlling for students’ academic stress (82.360 ± 14.8851), which is enormously significant (r = 0.269, p-value < 0.01) levels.

Even on day 3, the difference in weight gain between mice challenged with DH5α:pK184 subAB and the other two groups was highly significant (P < 0.01; Student's t test).