Differences were regarded as significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.
Excerpts
The total model was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), and the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05).
failed to reach significanceP = 0.01
Un-labelled pairwise comparisons failed to reach significance of P = 0.01 and were considered to be insignificant.
Significant differences were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and are presented as significant ( p < 0.05) and highly significant ( p < 0.01).
L0 shows a highly significant positive correlation with S1 ( p < 0.01) and a significant correlation with MP ( p < 0.05); it is negatively correlated only with S1 and positively correlated with all other factors.
Bins at, and adjacent to, the HPV16 integration site were also found to have highly significant gene expression variance ( p <0.01), although this finding was restricted to integrant clones without virus:host cis interactions ( Fig 10H–10J ).
These results were considered moderately significant when p < 0.01 and highly significant when p < 0.0001. 3 Results 3.1 Effect on body weight There was an insignificant difference in body weight in all groups in contrast to normal control before administering HFD.
In contrast, there was a marked and highly significant ( p <0.01) reduction in Y705 phosphorylated STAT3 by OLT1177 (82%) and AZD1480 (80%) compared to vehicle ( Figures 2C, D ).
Among them, there was a highly significant difference in the abundance of Bacteroides between the MME group and the HME group ( P < 0.01) ( Fig. 3 C, 3 D, 3 F).
The analysis of variance revealed a highly significant impact of the aeration treatment on the soluble solid content, organic acid content, and sugar acid ratio of the tomatoes ( p < 0.01).
The difference of globulin (6.75 ± 0.57 and 7.42 ± 0.66) between the two groups of elephants was highly significant ( P <0.01), and the mean value of albumin was higher in the TB seronegative group, indicating that total protein value may be an early indicator for TB ( Table 4 ).
In addition, the survival percent in largemouth bass injected with VHSV for 4 h prior to injection of LA showed a highly significant enhancement in comparison with that of the control group (38.813% vs. 8.696%, P < 0.01) (Fig. 3 F).
For vitality (χ 2 (4) = 11.33, p = 0.02, CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.07, SRMR = 0.04), there was a decreasing trend over time for Finnish employees (slope M = −0.48, SE = 0.18, p < 0.01), whereas the average change in vitality over time was non-significant for Japanese employees (slope M = 0.55, SE = 0.42, p = 0.19).
The statistical significance was set up p < 0.05, highly significant p < 0.01.
Regarding the overall sample, the Spearman rank correlation proves a highly significant relation between the score of the Correction scale and the parameter value of the other validity scales or that of the Dissimulation Index, respectively (all p≤0.01 between the K- and the F-scale with correlation coefficient (r)=–0.51; between the L-scale and the F-scale with (r)=–0.29 and between the Dissimulation Index (F-K) and the F-scale with (r)=0.71).
The brown module was highly significant and positively correlated with the highly resistant trait (R), with a correlation coefficient of 0.38 ( p < 0.01).
Additionally, highly significant ( p < 0.01) metabolic pathways were identified, including gga01232 (nucleotide metabolism), gga00250 (alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism), gga00240 (pyrimidine metabolism), gga04914 (progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation), gga00220 (arginine biosynthesis), gga00983 (drug metabolism—other enzymes), gga01230 (biosynthesis of amino acids), and gga00230 (purine metabolism).
All deconvolutions showed highly significant values (P<0.01 and correlation > 0.9).
The results are expressed as “mean ± SD,” and statistical significance was defined at p < 0.05, with highly significant values at p < 0.01.
Differences were considered statistically significant with * P < 0.05 and highly significant with ** P < 0.01.
As shown in Table 1 , there were highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) in the polar axis length, equatorial axis length, P/E ratio, and the volume index of pollen among the 46 germplasm resources.
Statistical analysis showed a highly significant association between stress and problematic pornography consumption ( P < 0.01), and internet addiction ( P <0.001).
While monitoring interactions among the factors, A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 demonstrated highly significant effects ( P < 0.01), whereas A showed significant effects ( P < 0.05).
Additionally, the rhizosphere fungal community exhibited highly significant negative direct effects on both the plant growth indicators and total alkaloid content of S. alopecuroides ( p < 0.01).
For the period 2000–2017 this is listed as a 0.6% annual percent change which is highly significant ( P < 0.01).