Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

marginally significantp < 0.010.2× alphagold
These analyses revealed that, in the last step of the model, both ESJ and SEC were significant or marginally significant predictors of in-person (ESJ: B = 0.581, s.e. = 0.223, t (181) = 2.61, p < 0.01; SEC: B = 0.032, s.e. = 0.012, t (181) = 2.71, p < 0.01) and online learning (ESJ: B = − 0.334, s.e. = 0.171, t (181) = − 1.95, p = 0.053; SEC: B = − 0.028, s.e. = 0.009, t (181) = -3.12, p < 0.01).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a significant negative correlation between Bacillus and ethyl hexanoate ( p < 0.05), Pichia showed a significant negative correlation with ethyl isobutyrate ( p < 0.05), Candida showed a highly significant negative correlation with ethyl butyrate ( p < 0.01), and Rhodosporidium was significantly positively correlated with ethyl butyrate ( p < 0.05).
highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Student's t-test was used to perform the statistical analysis for comparison between treatment and control groups, and difference was considered statistically significant when P < 0.05 (*) and highly significant when P < 0.01 (**). 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Biosynthesis and characterization of TpG The expression vector pET32a- pHLIP-Gelonin was constructed and successfully transformed into the competent E. coli DH5α as confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis ( Fig.
highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Variance analysis of MVN indicated that the effect of genotypic variance was highly significant ( P < 0.01) in single environments and across all environments, while the genotype × environment (G × E) interaction was highly significant ( P < 0.01) for across environments but environment variance was not significant.
extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
Significant differences between means were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s HSD test (SPSS software version 22.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and the statistically significant difference was set at p < 0.05, and extremely significant difference was at p < 0.01, respectively. 3.
highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
3 Results 3.1 Nitrogen inputs in wolfberry farmland under varying water and nitrogen regulations Water, nitrogen and their interactions had highly significant effects ( P < 0.01) on the nitrogen content of irrigation water ( Figure 3A ) and total nitrogen input ( Figure 3B ).