Excerpts

The correlation is significant at a confidence level (bilateral) ≤ 0.05 ( P < 0.05) and extremely significant when P -value ≤ 0.01.

The MANOVA revealed a highly significant effect for the group variable (Hotellings’ T 2 = 0.80, p < 0.01).

Correspondingly, the NE count was the highest in the observation group with a highly significant difference from the three control groups ( p < 0.01), as was the MONO count.

6 b, c) but did not quite reach significance (Atrogin-1: F 3,24 = 6.5, P < 0.01; MuRF1: F 3,24 = 3.4, P = 0.035).

Specifically, in the case of A172 and D54 cell lines, the increase was highly significant ( p < 0.01), while for U138 and D458, it was statistically significant ( p < 0.05).

ANOVA conducted across the environments showed an extremely significant effect ( P < 0.01) of G, E, and G × E interactions on both seed Fe and Zn content.

In other datasets, all other comparisons with the first in-vivo pipeline showed differences that were significant, or bordered on significance (HCP-M in-vivo repeat, p = 0.01; HCP-M synthetic, p = 0.06; Hospital synthetic, p = 0.08), but these median differences (0.33%, 0.24%, and 0.78% respectively) were again well below inter-group and longitudinal differences of clinical or scientific significance [E.g. 4 , 48 ]. 4.3 Comparison of Freesurfer labels Table 4 shows generalised Dice similarity coefficients for 70 cortical grey matter labels, or 16 deep grey-matter labels.

Differences in expression were considered significant ( * ) when P < 0.05 and highly significant ( ** ) when P < 0.01.

Whether or not visual feedback of the system was available, the effect of haptic feedback was highly significant on both the success and failure rates (p < 0.01), indicating the importance of artificial sensations of touch to successfully perform the complex simultaneous control task.

Data were considered statistically significant at p <0.05 and highly significant at p <0.01.

Similarly, prognostic risk factors such as AFP, PT and tumor volume were approximately significant, with higher AIDRS correlating with increased risk ( P ≤ 0.01 ) ( Figures 8F–H ).

Despite having the largest effective population size ( N e = 175 and 157, respectively), the fish sampled from UN and LN showed the highest inbreeding coefficients ( F IS = 0.056–0.053, respectively), which were highly significant ( p < 0.01).

Means were considered statistically significant for p < 0.05 and highly significant for p < 0.01 and p < 0.001.

In TL, the contents of Hg were significantly positively correlated with contents of Pb and Cd ( p < 0.05), and the positive correlation between Pb and Cd contents was highly significant ( p < 0.01).

A t > t 0.05( n -1) indicates considerable clumping ( P < 0.05), whereas t > t 0.01( n -1) indicates highly significant clumping ( P < 0.01).

Torres-González et al., in a study on Colombian lemon biscuits, described a positive and highly significant correlations ( p < 0.01) between fracturability and firmness ( r = 0.973), consistency ( r = 0.933) and maximum strength (hardness) ( r = 1), with a moderate correlation ( p < 0.05) between fracturability and stiffness ( r = 0.405) [ 46 ]. 3.1.5.

Transparency was affected by the industrial effluent discharge, particularly at stations 2, 4, 6, and 8 varying between 40 and 140 cm, with a highly significant geographical and temporal variations ( P < 0.01).

The model was found to be highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) and the lack of fit was non-significant ( p > 0.05), with all the independent variables significantly contributing to the FT .

In all groups, there was a significant trend in the incident of events regarding the amount of time with a valid prescription, the more time a patient was on a prescription the less incidence of events ( p < 0.01), Table 4 .

Our results showed a highly significant elevation of ALT ( p < 0.01, Figure 2 A) and AST ( p < 0.01, Figure 2 B) in the TAA-treated group compared to the control.

Among them, Cladosporium and Solicoccozyma in fungi and Gaiella in bacteria showed highly significant positive correlation with plant height and flower number ( p < 0.01).

Statistical differences were designated as significant if p -values were less than 0.05 ( # p ≤ 0.05), and highly significant if p -values were less than 0.01 ( ## p ≤ 0.01), less than 0.001 ( ### p ≤ 0.001) and less than 0.0001 ( #### p ≤ 0.0001).

rs8193069 had extremely significant effects on #LYMPH and TG ( p < 0.01) and significant effects on MCV, MCHC, #BASO and CK ( p < 0.05).

The extremely significant phenotypic differences in SN, GNS, TGW, and PH were detected between IV and 4B ND981 NILs ( p < 0.01).

We used a step-wise procedure for the selection of eigenshapes, so that only those eigenshapes that were highly significant in discriminating groups were selected in an iterative manner to be included in the analysis (p<0.01 for F-value of variable to be entered, p< 0.10 for F-value of a variable to be removed).