Significance levels were classified as extremely significant ( p < 0.01), significant ( p < 0.05), or not significant ( p > 0.05).
Excerpts
trilobata showed that the N content in shoots and roots was highly significant ( p < 0.01) with plant growth traits and other physio-bio traits; however, W. chinensis showed less significant correlation of growth traits and other traits compared with W. trilobata ( Figure 7 E,F). 3.
Figure 1 shows the highly significant quantitative correlation between HBeAg and HBV DNA levels on the log scale (R 2 = 0.658; P < .01).
Differences were considered significant at a P value <0.05 and extremely significant at values of P < 0.01 and P < 0.001.
3 ), the training load between APRE and VBRT exhibited significant differences ( p < 0.05) at 80%–90% 1RM, with highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) observed in weeks 3, 6, and 8.
An ANOVA revealed a significant main effect for the factor type of stimulus [F(1,11) = 8.27, p ≤ 0.05] and a highly significant main effect for the factor ISI [F(1,11) = 29.19, p ≤ 0.01].
RESULTS Although the average diastolic and systolic volume measurements of the AoR dimensions were not significantly different across the three age groups in the study population, a highly significant difference was observed in the volume measurements between male and female normotensive persons, P < 0.01 in each case.
All types of abuse and neglect correlated highly significant between each other (all ranging from r s = 0.172 to r s = 0.591, all p < 0.01).
Correlation analysis between the genotype and citric acid content of the 57 sequenced accessions revealed a strong, highly significant correlation ( r = 0.812, P < 0.01).
CAT activity showed highly significant positive correlations ( p < 0.01) with soluble protein content, number of green leaves, underground fresh weight, total root projected area, and number of root forks.
The decreasing trend of the concentrations of Na + , K + and HCO 3 − was highly significant at the age of 35 days ( P < 0.01) but the decreasing trend of the concentrations of each ion at the age of 42 days was alleviated ( P < 0.05).
The values of F were gradually decreased from the first model (37.98) to the fifth model (19.38) and also they were all highly significant ( p <0.01) supporting them as the better models.
A highly significant difference was reported when P < 0.01.
Spearman's rank correlation test showed a highly significant positive correlation between length of admission and cost (P < 0.01).
In particular organs of birds representing the first group, the presence of highly significant correlation ( p ≤ 0.01) was observed in all organs examined.
Similarly, Fu’s FS was negative and highly significant (P<0.01) for all the studied breeds.
This increase in metaphase cells is statistically highly significant ( P < 0.01 by the Chi squared test).
Similarly, only one multiple-threshold model goodness-of-fit test was nominally significant (M–M DZ twin pairs, P =0.01) in the TE cohort ( Table 2 ); however, considering goodness-of-fit tests were performed for each of the five zygosity groups and four additional combined groupings, this finding is not considered study-wide significant.
Our results revealed an increasing trend in n -3 and n -6 LCPUFA and a marked increase in C18:0, C20:4 n -6, C22:6 n -3 ( p < 0.01) and C22:5 n -3 ( p < 0.05), respectively ( Figure 6 ). 3.
Warming rate had no significant effect on CT max , (p = 0.505) but body length had a highly significant effect (p < 0.01) ( Fig 2F , S1 Table ).
A significant association was found between time interval (12 h, 24 h, and 48 h) and metabolites likewise Alanin, Lactate, Acetate, Glutamate, Tyrosine, Histidine, Phenylalanine, Creatine, Choline and Formate respectively released by cell during infection, which is highly significant ( p < 0.01).
The Mantel test results demonstrated a significant or highly significant correlation between gd and ggd (R 2 = 0.1942, p < 0.01), gd and pre (R 2 = 0.2018, p < 0.01), gd and vapr (R 2 = 0.3297, p < 0.01), gd and sra (R 2 = 0.3849, p < 0.01), and gd and tmin (R 2 = 0.0536, 0.01 < p < 0.05).
The difference in the mean intensities was highly significant (p-value < 0.01, Fig. 2C ).
534, −0.032, 0.522, 0.242, 0.592, and 0.547, respectively, which are highly significant at three instances ( P < 0.01).
Differences were considered to be significant at p < 0.05 and to be highly significant at p < 0.01.