Excerpts

Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and considered significant when P < 0.05 and highly significant when P < 0.01.

When the P value is less than 0.05, the difference is considered significant (* P < 0.05); When the P value is less than 0.01 and 0.001, the difference is considered highly significant (* * P < 0.01) and extremely significant (* * P < 0.001), respectively.

The magnitude of logistic regression coefficients of good agriculture practices revealed that occupation was a highly significant (p < 0.01) socio-economic variable influencing the adoption of good agriculture practices.

The differences were considered to be significant when P < 0.05 and highly significant when P < 0.01.

Statistically significant difference was set at p < 0.05 and highly significant difference was set at p <0.01.

Other subgroups did not reach statistical significance under the corrected threshold of P < 0.01 ( Table 3 ).

As shown in Figure 5(i) , there was a significant decrease in the CA1 regions of the hippocampus in CE, AD, and ADE groups compared with the C group, with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01).

Likewise, this difference was apparent in COMBAT Stroke estimations; 1.5T: median mismatch volume = 62 mL (13, 106), p < 0.01, 3T: median mismatch volume = 15 mL (0, 102).

Following 8 months of exposure, the exposed group demonstrated a highly significant increase in micronuclei frequency compared to the non-exposed group ( p < 0.01).

Differences were considered significant at P≤0.05 and highly significant at P≤0.01.

The inter-group differences were defined as significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.01.

Stem and spike number Combined analysis across treatments for stem number per plant at stem elongation, maximum stem number per m 2 , and maturity spike number per m 2 indicated highly significant ( P < 0.01) differences within the environment, line, tillering group, and density treatments, with no significant interaction effect ( Table 2A ).

Importantly, after adjusting for EuroSCORE II, NT-proBNP and baseline glomerular filtration rate, the association between complications and C8-carnitine levels remained highly significant (t = 2.749, p < 0.01).

Notably, ATP1B2 exhibited a highly significant expression in the heart of Lop sheep ( p < 0.01).

Differences were considered to be significant at P < 0.05 or *, extremely significant at P < 0.01 or **.

Indeed, when exclusive Cladocera data were analyzed against all other taxa (Figure 1 ), the statistical difference was highly significant (Mann‐Whitney U test, p < 0.01).

We added genes to the polarization pathways if they were nominally significant ( P < 0.01) and positively associated (fold change > 1) with the given polarization condition.

Although their FDR-corrected q-values did not reach statistical significance, four pathways with p -values < 0.01 were related to MAPK (Additional file 7 : Table S2).

Differences in root morphological traits across root orders Root order had an extremely significant effect on the average diameter, SRL, SSA, and RTD of T. chinensis fine roots ( p < 0.01; Supplementary Table 2 ).

If the correlation coefficient was highly significant (P<0.01), indicating there was reasonable correspondence between traits, data were averaged over sites or years environments.

Consistent with these findings, additional analysis (see S7 Table ) found that the association between age-disparate partnerships and transactional sex was highly significant within urban areas (aOR: 4.14; p<0.01; 95%CI: 2.03–8.46), but not significantly different within rural areas (aOR: 1.04; p = 0.92; 95%CI: 0.42–2.58).

After post hoc testing, the following significance levels were specified: extremely significant ( ∗∗∗ p < 0.001), highly significant ( ∗∗ p < 0.01), significant ( ∗ p < 0.05), and not significant ( p > 0.05). 3.

In comparison with the model group, a concentration-dependent increase in thymic and splenic indices was observed in LH-6-treated immunosuppressed mice, and the thymus and spleen indices of the 200 mg/kg LH-6 group were extremely significant ( p < 0.01), demonstrating that LH-6 has a certain repairing effect on CTX-induced damage to immune organs. 3.2.

As can be seen in Table 2 , the coefficients for the linear terms ( X 1 , X 2 and X 3 ) and the quadratic terms ( X 1 2 and X 3 2 ) were highly significant ( p < 0.01).

The study found that after controlling for total population size and youth population size, per capita disposable income showed a marginally significant positive correlation with both the number of top teams ( r = 0.320, P = 0.091) and the number of elite teams ( r = 0.359, P = 0.056); GDP ( r = 0.458, P = 0.012), per capita GDP ( r = 0.466, P = 0.011), per capita disposable income ( r = 0.414, P = 0.026), and per capita consumption expenditure ( r = 0.412, P = 0.026) all exhibited a moderately significant positive correlation with the number of social youth training institutions; per capita disposable income ( r = −0.469, P = 0.010) and per capita consumption expenditure ( r = −0.448, P = 0.015) showed a moderately significant negative correlation with the number of featured schools; the level of cl