As shown in Figure 3 , the expression levels of the four candidate marker genes began to increase significantly after 0.5 h of chitin treatment ( p < 0.05), and their transcription levels reached a highly significant peak at 2–4 hpt ( p < 0.01) and then showed a decreasing trend.
Excerpts
Results: Increase in NCF of instruments in DCT 24 group was highly significant ( P < 0.01; Tukey's honest significant difference).
The data were considered significant if P < 0.05 and highly significant if P < 0.01.
The mean percentage total score for children in the comparison group was 59.7% and for the children with ASD was 35.8%, a difference that was highly significant, F (1,40) = 12.28, p < 0.01.
There was a highly significant correlation ( P < 0.01) between the size of the stone (SDW, SL, SW, and FT) and kernel (KDW, KL, and KW).
The difference between groups was highly significant ( P < 0.01).
* indicates significant correlation between protein and quality traits ( P < 0.05), ** indicates highly significant association ( P < 0.01).
p -values below 0.05 (* p < 0.05) were statistically significant; below 0.01, they were statistically highly significant (** p < 0.01).
Statistical significance of probes was determined using Student's T-test ( http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/t-test.html ) with p-values: p>0.05 (not significant, n.s.); p<0.05 (weakly significant; *); p<0.01 (significant; **); p<0.001 (highly significant; ***).
As shown in Figure 8 A, the shoot lengths with 200 and 600 mg/L decolorized NC (200-1 and 600-1) were 1.38- and 1.24-fold those of 200 and 600 mg/L untreated NC (200-0 and 600-0), respectively, and the differences were highly significant ( p < 0.01).
CC 50 – 50% cytotoxic concentration (mean ± SD; μg/mL); SI – Selectivity Index (CC 50 VERO/ CC 50 Cancer); Statistical significance of higher cytotoxicity towards cancer-originating cell lines was evaluated regarding results obtained for non-cancerous VERO cells (2-way ANOVA; Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test); a highly significant ( p < 0.01) anticancer cytotoxicity was labeled where applicable.
However, a highly significant difference was observed between the pretest and posttest HR values (p < 0.01).
Differences were regarded as significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.
Data were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U test, in which differences were considered significant (*) at P values of ≤ 0.05 and highly significant (**) at P values of ≤ 0.01.
Correlation analysis of basic soil properties As shown in Table 4 , SOM exhibited a highly significant positive correlation with TP (0.914) ( P < 0.01) and significant positive correlations with TK (0.781), AN (0.726), and AK (0.775) ( P < 0.05).
The data were considered significant if the p value were equal to or less than 0.05 and highly significant if the p value < 0.01.
If the correlation coefficient was highly significant (P<0.01), indicating there was reasonable correspondence between traits, data were averaged over sites or years environments.
The correlation between the number of seeds and the cell width in the middle of the mesocarp was positively correlated (0.57) in CK treatment, while the correlation decreased in A1 and A2 treatments, but it showed extremely significant positive correlation ( p < 0.01) and significant positive correlation ( p < 0.05) under A3 and A4 treatments, respectively.
All raw data were analyzed through repeated tests, and significant differences ( p < 0.05) and extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) were analyzed. 3.
All comparisons were highly significant (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.01; Table 2 ).
Heparin caused no significant decrease of heart LPL in fed rats, but a highly significant (p < 0.01) washout in the fasted rats, about 40%.
The data were considered significant if the p-value was equal to or less than 0.05 and highly significant if the p-value < 0.01.
This result was highly significant (p = 0.01).
Although plasma IL-6 levels did not significantly differ between pre-manifest and early HD patients ( g = −0.06, 95% CI = −0.42,0.31, P = 0.76), plasma IL-6 levels were significantly increased in moderate versus pre-manifest HD patients ( g = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.11,0.85, P = 0.01) and moderate versus early HD patients ( g = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.18,0.86, P = 0.003); demonstrating an overall trend of increasing plasma IL-6 levels with HD progression ( g = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.07,0.58, P = 0.01). 3.5.
Compared to the blank control group, ### indicates p < 0.001, a highly significant difference, ## indicates p < 0.01, a significant difference; # indicates p < 0.05, a significant difference; compared to the control group, *** indicates p < 0.001, a highly significant difference; ** indicates p < 0.01, a significant difference; * indicates p < 0.05, a significant difference. 5.