Arranging species in different taxonomical groups (Hemiptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Mixed insect orders, and Non-insects) allowed us to identify 20 peptidase families with significant differentiation among these five sets (Kluskal-Wallis test, p < 0.05; A22, C1, C13, C40, C69, C86, M12B, M17, M19, M38, M79, M87, S1, S10, S24, S28, S33, S54, S60, and S72), including three highly significant ( p < 0.01; C13, M19, and M79; Supplementary Table 7 and Figure 3C ).After comparing R. prolixus protease gene frequencies with the Percentile 90 from the other 18 arthropod genomes, we observed seven families where R. prolixus gene frequencies are higher than in most of other species (greater than Percentile 90): A1, C2, M17, M74, N6, S24, and S29 (Supplementary Figure 2 ).
Excerpts
of borderline significanceP = 0.01
By chi-square analysis, the data corresponding to the elevated numbers of intergenic hot sites were very significant ( P < 0.0001) for cells sporulated at 30°C and 37°C and were of borderline significance ( P = 0.01) for cells sporulated at 14°C ( Table S2 ); because of corrections for multiple comparisons, only P values of <0.003 are significant.
WHO grade was highly significant in most of the subtests (p < 0.01 in 8/15 subtests and p < 0.05 in 3/15 subtests).
The results presented in Table 2 indicate a highly significant implicit effect of the evaluative IAT test ( t = −18.02, df = 102, p < 0.01).
For the full monthly time series, Tmean, Tx and Tn all exhibited highly significant (p < 0.01) positive trends (0.21°C, 0.24°C and 0.21 °C per decade, respectively, see Table 1 ).
The total of NDVI and WET contributed more than 70% ( p < 0.01, highly significant); in particular, in 2005 and 2020, they contributed more than 90%.
showed a trendp < 0.01
In contrast, TIMP3 showed a trend toward decreased expression in advanced stages, with significant reductions at stages II and III compared with stage I ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 2 C).
Differences were considered significant (*) at P <0.05 and highly significant (**) at P <0.01 for all comparison.
The Cochran Q statistics showed highly significant ( p < 0.01) differences between the studies included for S, St, and Ec prevalence in the world sub-grouped based on year, continent, period, species, method, bacterial species, and type of mastitis, showing the heterogeneity between the studies selected for meta-analysis.
As shown in Figure 2 , when AE concentration was in the 250–2000 mg/L range, AE promoted SC proliferation after treating for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h; at a concentration of 500–2000 mg/L, cell proliferation in different groups was significantly increased by comparison with control group ( P < 0.05); when the concentrations were 1000 and 2000 mg/L, drug-treated groups showed the extremely significant difference compared to control group ( P < 0.01). 3.3.
Statistical significant differences were considered at p <0.05 and markedly significant differences were considered at p< 0.01.
Furthermore, the FRSM100 group showed a highly significant decrease in serum UREA content relative to the CSD, FRSM50, and FRSM75 groups ( p < 0.01).
It was found that at the same chronological age, there was highly significant difference ( P < 0.01) in each group.
The average mean age for participation in the study is 32.5 years and found to be highly significant ( P < 0.01) with inverse relation indicating that younger patients give better PSR-OHS.
The treatment with tadalafil 2 hours after the micro-neurosurgical lesions reduced the experimental MOFS lesions development, in a highly significant level (P<0.01) of 58.75%.
a trend towards significancep < 0.1
Statistical significance is presented at the 1% level (highly significant, p < 0.01), the 5% level (significant, p < 0.05), and the 10% level (a trend towards significance, p < 0.1).
In fact, we could observe a highly significant ( p < 0.01) length reduction in 7-day-old dark grown int1.1 hypocotyls on both media (Figures 2A,C,E ).
The treatment groups receiving 200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg doses of AJME showed moderately significant improvements (P < 0.01), similar to the GSH level restoration observed in the standard group (P < 0.05).
trend toward significanceP = 0.01
Discrimination did not differ substantially across the nonproestrus phases of the estrous cycle, with animals showing a significant difference (or trend toward significance) between the CS+ and CS− in the estrus ( P = 0.01), metestrus ( P = 0.036), and diestrus ( P = 0.074) phases ( Fig. 3 B).
All possible combinations between the studied pairs of traits showed a highly significant ( p < 0.01) positive correlation, except for the pairs involved potassium with all other traits.
The comparison analysis of POD activity between the resistant and susceptible rice lines showed markedly significant differences ( P < 0.01) at all the time points.
Results showing P value less than 0.05 were considered as significant (P < 0.05) and whereas P value less than 0.01 as highly significant (P < 0.01).
Heterotypic seroconversion was highly significant against A/H5N1 in the 2006–2007 and 2010–2011 VCCs and in the 2006–2007 VCC against A/H9N2 (McNemar; p < 0.01).
Experiments demonstrated that at 2 Hz, the Normal Keel configuration reduced the standard deviation of the head pitch angle by 20.9%, which is a highly significant result ( p < 0.01).
Among them, the protein levels of TLR4 and MyD88 in the Bilo+Ly group were extremely significant ( p < 0.01).