Aniline blue (AB) chromatin quality Treatment with RJ showed a markedly significant decrease in the percentage of spermatozoa with chromatin abnormalities (p=0.010, Table 4 , Fig.1 ).
Excerpts
The proportion of patient hospital stays with an infectious disease main ICD-10 diagnosis was highly significant (P <0.01) and strongly correlated (beta weights of 0.36 to 0.47) with all antibiotic use and with the use of penicillins, but not with BSA use.
2 shows that fish exposed to radiation only (G2) showed a highly significant decrease (93%) in their WBC counts; 16 × 10 3 /mm 3 as compared with 238 × 10 3 /mm 3 for control fish G1 ( P < 0.01).
As shown in Table 3 , the model was highly significant ( p < 0.01), and the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) obtained by dividing the regression sum of squares by the total sum of squares was 0.98.
sclerotiorum strains with the R ST highly significant ( P < 0.01) for pairwise combination North/Center-West ( R ST = 0.094 and 0.064 with clonally corrected data) and North/South-West ( R ST = 0.152 and 0.099 with clonally corrected data).
2 c). MicroRNA differential expression There were 27 highly significant ( p < 0.01) differentially expressed miRNAs of murine origin between FA- and CAPs-exposed groups (Fig. 3 a, b) in mCECs, as measured in the SCIP assay.
The direct feedback intervention method resulted in highly significant (p ≤ 0.01) improvement in the percent of sign-outs documenting five of the checklist items (pre, post): mental status (67.0, 80.0 %), decisionality (51.1, 67.5 %), degree of sick (59.1, 68.5 %), absence of confusing or conflicting information (90.9, 95.3 %), and absence of vague language (61.2, 68.1 %).
Differences between groups were highly significant ( P < 0.01).
Statistically significant differences were evaluated by a two-tailed Student’s t -test, considering any p -value below 0.05 ( p < 0.05) as statistically significant; meanwhile, highly significant differences were any p -value below 0.01 ( p < 0.01). 4.
For example, the coefficient for FRY measured in SRT and PYT ( n = 2690) was only 0.12, yet highly significant ( P < 0.01).
In the distal, intermediate, and proximal measurements, ‘Group’ had a highly significant effect (p < 0.01), while ‘Time’ alone was not significant.
At 2 h post-infection, the virulence of the deletion strain ∆ preA in EPC cells was 1.3-fold higher than that of the parent strain; the difference between the two strains was extremely significant ( p < 0.01). 2.6.
The correlation between the relative expression of LpCHI and total flavonoid content is highly significant ( P < 0.01).
Also, an increasing trend of amplitude with san increase in the magnitude of stimulus variation was found in the intensity deviant responses (p<0.01) (one-way ANOVA) (Figure 3 ).
Metabolic Pathway Marker Validation The concentrations of LTB4, PGF2α, and AA in the serum of cows in the non-pregnant and pregnant groups were examined by ELISA, and it was found that, compared with the non-pregnant group, there was a significant decrease in the concentration of LTB4 in the serum metabolites of cows in the pregnant group ( p < 0.05), a highly significant decrease in the concentration of PGF2α ( p < 0.01) and a non-significant difference in the change in the concentration of arachidonic acid, AA, in the pregnant group (NS) ( Figure 4 ). 3.4.
Even after 60 s plasma exposure, a highly significant decline ( p <0.01) in colony survival fraction up to 0.2, 0.52 and 0.68, respectively was detected in T98G, KB and HEK293 cells.
In conclusion, differences among genotypes were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) whereas the variety by section of the root interaction was not significant ( p ≥ 0.20).
A t -test demonstrated a highly significant difference between groups ( P < 0.01) [ 14 ].
This difference was most predominant, and highly significant, in the NaF-EDTA-citrate test group ( p < 0.01).
Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05, with highly significant results defined as P < 0.01.
This effect is highly significant (p<0.01) from the last until the 8th quarter before death and influenced by age.
A significant difference ( p < 0.05) was observed between Mode, GAL and GAM groups, and a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01) was shown between GAH and Aspirin groups.
A highly significant correlation ( r = 0.907, p≤0.01) was found between the averaged ZSVs of the eight main recombinant genotypes determined in 2005-2006 and those in 2007-2008, suggesting that the genetic effects of the different Glu-3 genotypes on ZSV were relatively stable between the two years.
The mean percentage total score for children in the comparison group was 59.7% and for the children with ASD was 35.8%, a difference that was highly significant, F (1,40) = 12.28, p < 0.01.
Differences were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05 and highly significant at p ≤ 0.01.