Temperature also had highly significant ( P -value < 0.01) correlations with all the modules except the tan module, and was most strongly correlated with the brown module (0.88, P -value 1e-22).
Excerpts
Inter-individual comparison between attention and stimulation-related audio-visual topographic correlations After conversion of correlations between auditory and visual-related current density distributions into Fisher's Z transforms, we performed paired t-tests that resulted in highly significant differences, both in the comparison between the transformed correlations in theta and beta1 bands (t = −2.99, p<0.01), and between the Fisher's Z scores averaged across theta and delta bands, and the scores averaged across beta1, beta2 and slow potentials (t = −5.885, p<0.0001).
Firstly, (A + U) 12 % was compared with (A + U) 3 %, a highly significant correlation was observed (Spearman r = 0.475, P < 0.01).
An extremely significant difference was observed between the group receiving free Ptx and the group receiving Ptx nanoparticles ( P < 0.01) or Ptx/Tet nanoparticles ( P < 0.01).
However, there was a highly significant decrease in lactate clearance in LPS animals (point B: 46 (30 to 180) versus 1,212 (743 to 2,116) ml/min, P <0.01; point D: 113 (65 to 322) versus 944 (363 to 1,235) ml/min, P <0.01).
Nephrotoxic AKI showed an increasing trend in recent years (P < 0.01) and mainly caused by rifampicin and NSAIDs.
T = 2; U -test, p = 1), OPD in sediment from exclusion treatment enclosures decreased from 32 mm ± 3 at T = 3 to 12 mm ± 2 (mean ± SE) at T = 5, exhibiting a 63% reduction and resulting in a highly significant difference between treatments (Mann–Whitney U -test; p < 0.01).
Vitamin A was associated with a marginally significant reduction of 2.39 days (p = 0.01, 95% CI: 4.19-0.47), while zinc supplementation yielded a more pronounced effect, averaging a 3.17-day reduction (p < 0.01, 95% CI: 5.19-1.31).
Differences were deemed highly significant for p < 0.01, significant for p < 0.05, and indicative of a trend for 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1.
Interpretation thresholds followed standard normal distribution critical values: ±1.96 ( p > 0.05) = Nonsignificant deviation; ±1.96 to ± 2.58 (0.01 < p < 0.05) = Marginal significance and ±2.58 to ± 3.29 (0.001 < p < 0.01): Strong evidence against independence.
A t -test confirmed that all correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.01).
Results and Discussion A highly significant ( P < 0.01) elevation in serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) activity was observed in DEN and DEN + C. dactylon groups when compared with control mice, Whereas the DEN + Tamoxifen treated animals showed the low significant alteration with DEN and DEN + C. dactylon groups [ Figure 1 ].
Differences were considered statistically significant at P ≤.05 (marginally significant at P ≤.1, highly significant at P ≤.01, and extremely significant at P <.001). 18 In addition, a post hoc power analysis was carried out to examine the power of the bond strength data using G*Power 3.1.7 software.
Statistical significance of probes was determined according to Student's T-test ( http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/t-test.html ) and p-value was scaled accordingly: p>0.05 (not significant, n.s.); p<0.05 (weakly significant; *); p<0.01 (significant; **); p<0.001 (highly significant; ***).
The experimental data were fitted to a quadratic polynomial model, yielding the following regression equation: Y = 72.72 + 5.65 A − 4.07 B − 5.9 C + 2.62 AB + 0.5250 AC + 0.325 BC − 6.55 A 2 − 11.1 B 2 − 5.45 C 2 As shown in the ANOVA results (Table S4), the model is highly significant ( P < 0.01), while the lack-of-fit term is non-significant ( P > 0.05), indicating that the model accurately predicts the experimental data.
In addition, the protein levels of COX-2 and iNOS in the liver tissue exhibited an increasing trend with the occurrence of acute ALD ( P < 0.01), but they were significantly reduced after administration of medium- and high-dose RDAE ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01) ( Fig. 7 A–G).
The data of the heavy metals in the present work revealed that there is a highly significant (P < 0.01) difference between the two sites, the increase in values of site 1 may be attributed to a number of factors such as industrial effluents, agricultural drainage and waste municipal [ 31 ].
Significant findings (*) with a p -value <0.05 and highly significant findings (**) with a p -value <0.01 or (***) with a p -value <0.001.
When both pathways are removed, system performance drops to its lowest (F1 = 85.6 ± 1.4%, FID = 40.2 ± 1.8), with highly significant differences from the full model ( p < 0.01), confirming the essential contribution of bidirectional interaction.
Mean plasma nitrite concentration as a marker of NO-production 20 was not different for the first 2 days but did show a highly significant increase after 7 days (from baseline 14.2 ± 1.1 μM to 82.3 ± 11.7 μM at 7 days, p < 0.01; figure 1 C ).
However, significant ( p < 0.05) and highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) differences were noted in the contents of some SFAs (C6:0, C8:0, C10:0, C12:0, C14:0, C16:0,andC17:0) and UFAs (C18:1n9c, C18:1n9t,C18:1n7t, C18:2n6c, CLA, C18:3n3, and C20:1),as well as in the total contents of SFAs and UFAs ( Table 2 ) between the genotypes of the SNP g.841G/C.
As shown in Table 5 , the p value of the model is less than 0.0001, indicating that the regression model is highly significant ( p < 0.01).
There were highly significant differences between the control group (Control) and the three concentration groups of Escherichia coli infection (E1, E2, E3) ( p < 0.01).
Statistical significance was defined as 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05, highly significant as p < 0.01, and a significant trend as 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10. 3.
The difference of the obtained values was considered to be significant when p < 0.05, and highly significant when p < 0.01.