Excerpts

A summary of conjugate formation assays show that 2C/T2 conjugate formation is highly significant (p<0.01) in the presence of ATR when compared to controls (Figure 1D ).

The swimming speed is faster than normal because treated larvae display very few or completely absent protruding chaetae (in a highly significant way, Student's test p < 0.01; figure 3 a–d ).

In addition, omitting 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, 2-ethyl-5-methylpyrazine, 2-ethyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazine, ( Z )-jasmone, and 2,3-diethyl-5-methylpyrazine, respectively, from the recombinant models resulted in highly significant differences ( p < 0.01).

Nearly all quadratic factors exhibited highly significant effects ( p < 0.01) on response variables.

Brucellosis herd transmission risk score Univariable ordinal analyses showed highly significant associations between the brucellosis herd transmission risk score with District and ‘Heard about human brucellosis’ (both P < 0.01).

An asterisk or different letters denoted statistical significance for values of p < 0.05, while two asterisks denoted highly significant values of p < 0.01.

Analysis of variance indicated that differences in average GI values between TaAFP-Ba and TaAFP-Bb and between TaAFP-Ba-GFP and TaAFP-Bb-GFP genotypes were the most highly significant ( P < 0.01) among all measured traits.

There were extremely significant differences among the temperature stress treatments ( p < 0.01).

However, the differences were highly significant (p<0.01) when water intake of broilers fed with high levels of DPK (3% and 4%) compared with birds fed low levels of DPK (1% and 2%) and control group.

The difference in mean score in the experimental group was found to be statistically highly significant at P < 0.01 level of significance.

Analysis of the various metabolites in the two groups of samples revealed significant differences in nucleotide and vitamin-related metabolites ( P < 0.05; Figure 5C ) and extremely significant differences in indole-related metabolites ( P < 0.01; Figure 5C ).

Initial Vaccination Coverage v ( 0 ) The effect of the initial vaccination coverage was determined to be highly significant in all parameter combinations ( p < 0.01 ).

Highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) differences in ZEN concentrations ( Figure 1 ) were observed only in blood samples collected from the MCV.

An extremely significant difference was expressed with “**” when p < 0.01.

In paired samples, telomere shortening was observed in both sets of patients with HCC, who had either pre-existing serologically confirmed either hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection, but not in HCC patients without pre-existing HBV or HCV infection (mean ± S.E.M., 0.82 ± 0.02 (control), 0.81 ± 0.01 (HCC without HBV or HCV infection), 0.47 ± 0.01 (HCC + HBV), and 0.43 ± 0.01 (HCC_HCV), SS3.15, MS 1.58, F 195.29, P <0.001, ANOVA; between groups comparison, M1 or M4 compared with M2 and M1 or M4 compared with M3, but not M1 compared with M4, were highly significant, P <0.01, Tukey’s HSD test) ( Figure 1 A).

Differences were regarded as significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.

The variation was judged significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.01.

All p -values were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05, extremely significant at P < 0.01.

Heparin caused no significant decrease of heart LPL in fed rats, but a highly significant (p < 0.01) washout in the fasted rats, about 40%.

This made the difference in c-Fos protein expression between stressed Demonstrators of the two strains highly significant ( p < 0.01, Figure 3G ).

All correlations were statistically highly significant ( P < 0.01).

When these variables are included in the model they have (as a group) highly significant independent effect, apart from radiation exposure, on all circulatory disease, IHD and heart disease apart from IHD and hypertensive disease ( p < 0.01, results not shown); the adjusted trends with dose are very similar to those of the main analysis ( Table 3 , Supplementary Table S4 ).

However, the expression of several subunits showed a trend toward decrease in rpDLB; therefore, significant differences between DLB and rpDLB were restricted to NDUFB8, SDHB, ATP5A, and ATP50 ( p < 0.01) (Figure 1 ).

Compared with the control (0 mg/kg), LPS injection at 4 and 8 mg/kg increased plasma LPS concentrations ( P < 0.05), and the difference between the control and the 8 mg/kg LPS treatment was highly significant ( P < 0.01).

The interaction SPZ × IT was highly significant ( P < 0.01) on the HSP90a levels, a significant effect ( P < 0.05) on the levels of the L-PGDS, and had no effect ( P > 0.05) on the concentration of the two isoforms of NPC2.