Next, Pearson correlation coefficients were determined for each pair of OTUs and highly significant ( P < 0.01) correlations were visualized using Cytoscape ( Figure 5B ).
Excerpts
Relative to the BL-99 and the FOS groups, the BL-99_FOS group showed a highly significant increase in acetic acid content ( P < 0.01) and a marked decrease in CO 2 and H 2 S contents ( P < 0.01) in the fermentation broth.
Effects of SEA on Serum ALT Levels in Rabbits As shown in Table 2 , the ALT levels in group TEA-HF at 3 h after electroacupuncture were extremely significant difference compared with control group ( p < 0.01 ), but no significant difference was noted among the other groups. 3.4.
One-way ANOVA analysis of serum and salivary LDH and ALP between control, HNSCC revealed an extremely significant difference in serum and salivary ALPand LDH (P <0.01) only between the groups which is in agreement with the findings of Pereira et al., (2015).
A comparison of the median values using a one-way Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance showed highly significant differences in the speech activity (% PET, H = 9.166, p = 0.010), CARS score (H = 16.209, p = 0.0003) and SNAP-IV score (H = 10.148, p = 0.006) during the six month follow-up period. 3.4.
The correlation coefficient was-0.93, which was highly significant ( p <0.01).
After exercise interventions for 12 weeks, the results showed that there was a highly significant correlation (P= 0.01, r= 0.78) between the level of DHEA/S hormone and physical activity level (LPTA).
Mann-Whitney test showed the difference to be highly significant (P< 0.01).
In newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients, a highly significant correlation was found between cathepsin D levels and HOMA-IR ( r = 0.25, P = 0.01).
graveolens extract showed highly significant activity ( p < 0.01) compared to C+ at all concentrations tested against S. mutans , and Table 4 shows that L. graveolens extract showed highly significant activity ( p < 0.01) at 2000 and 3000 μg/mL compared to C+, when tested against S. sorbinus .
Highly significant (p < 0.01) correlation (r = 0.96; N = 270) was found between beat to beat fetal heart rate (FHR ECG ) from fECG and the same (FHR PCG ) from fetal PCG signals.
There was a highly significant difference between the allopurinol group and the model group ( p < 0.01) and a significant difference between the medium-polar compound group and the model group ( p < 0.05), but no significant difference between the medium-polar compound group and the allopurinol group ( p > 0.05).
The statistical analysis of the antitumor effect by two-way ANOVA shows that, while the control and lignin-treated groups are not statistically different, proving that lignin itself does not cause any significant antitumor effect, there is highly significant statistical difference ( p << 0.01) of the averages of calculated volumes of all the three treated tumor groups ( Figure 4 A) as well as the final masses of the excised tumors at day 14 ( Figure 4 E).
Differences were considered highly significant or significant at P ≤ 0.01 or P ≤ 0.05, respectively.
Regarding sleep, the children’s CSHQ scores were better after the lockdown than before the lockdown, with a highly significant difference in CSHQ scores ( p < 0.01).
Total anthocyanin biosynthesis and accumulation showed a significant negative correlation with gene expression (correlation coefficient > −0.8; P < 0.05), including that of C4H1 , FLS1 , FLS3 , 4CL , ANR , ANS , CYP98A3/C3H , CHI , DFR , PAL1 , PAL2 , CCR2 , CYP73A13 , UDP75L12 ( UDP75L121 , UDP75L122 and UDP75L123 ) and UDP78A15 , but an extremely significant positive correlation with F3H expression (correlation coefficient > 0.8; P < 0.01).
The differences were highly significant ( P < 0.01).
In this work, an isotig was considered differentially expressed when it exhibited a highly significant difference in read abundance at p < 0.01.
The proportion of phenols and for antioxidants remaining after pasteurization was higher for ROP than OP, with a highly significant statistical significance ( p < 0.01).
Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05 ( * ) or highly significant at P < 0.01 ( * * ).
Significant ( p < 0.05) and highly significant ( p < 0.01) correlations were observed linking the top 20 bacterial ( Figure 8A ) and fungal ( Figure 8B ) genera with DMs.
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s t test was applied on data by using graph pad prism version 5.0 Data were considered statistically highly significant at p < 0.001, moderately significant at p < 0.01, and significant at p < 0.05 [ 47 ]. 3.
Compared with the LPS group, the lung index of the OS and DXM groups showed a decreasing trend ( P <0.01), while the lung index of the OS and DXM groups also showed an increase compared with the NS group (P <0.05).
Substances with significant negative correlations are shown in Table 2 , and all substances had extremely significant correlations ( p < 0.01) or significant correlations ( p < 0.05).
These correlations were highly significant at early and late season (early: F = 13.41, df = 1,13, p < 0.01, late: F = 15.88, df = 1,14, p < 0.01) and near significant at peak season ( F = 4.312, df = 1.14, p = 0.057).