Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp-value < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A correlation matrix was calculated for these genes, using Pearson Product-Moment Coefficient, defined as r x , y = ∑ i = 1 n ( x i − x ̄ ) ( y i − y ̄ ) ( n − 1 ) δ x δ y The values of Pearson correlations above 0.3 are statistically highly significant (p-value < 0.00001 after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing [ 85 ]).
highly significantp < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The difference between the MS and the control group regarding the frequency of a positive MRZ, MRZB or MRZBU reaction, as defined by a bi- or trispecific response, was highly significant ( p < 0.00001, Mann–Whitney U test, irrespective of whether the single steroid-treated control patient was included or not).
highly significantP <10 −50.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The patient is assigned the high or low risk of relapse category if the score is ⩾2.41 or <2.41, respectively, with highly significant differences in RFS ( P <10 −5 ) and OS ( P <10 −5 ) between both groups.
highly significantP < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the SA27063 × A17 F 2 population a highly significant quantitative trait locus (QTL, LOD = 7.37; P < 0.00001) named r esistance to the n ecrotroph P homa m edicaginis one ( rnpm1 ) genetically mapped to the top arm of linkage group 4 (LG4). rnpm1 explained 33.6% of the phenotypic variance in the population's response to infection depicted on a 1–5 scale and was tightly linked to marker AW256637 .
highly significantP<0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
the time from diagnosis (in radically treated patients) until the first appearance of regional recurrences or distant spread, and overall patient survival (survival time until death from thyroid cancer) were compared across seasons. RESULTS Registry cases The 2627 thyroid cancer cases diagnosed in Norway during 1970-85 showed a highly significant time-effect when incidence was compared across 12 months (X2 = 119.3, P<0.00001) or four seasons (x2 = 35.6, P<0.00001), being highest during the last 3- month period October-December (Figure IA).
highly significantp < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Pairwise F ST values with outlier SNPs were all highly significant ( p < 0.00001) and were highest for comparisons involving the conventional plot ( F ST = 0.071 for conventional versus semi-conventional; F ST = 0.070 for conventional versus semi-organic; F ST = 0.049 for semi-conventional versus semi-organic).
highly significantP < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The overall Repeated Measures ANOVA applied to compare the values of n i obtained for all three ant groups revealed a highly significant effect of the between-subject effect „group” ( F 2,117 = 27,297, P < 0.00001), a highly significant effect of the within-subject effect „time” ( F 9,1053 = 31.303, P < 0.00001), and a significant interaction „group” x „time” ( F 18,1053 = 1.721, P = 0.031).