The analysis revealed that the feeding method itself had a highly significant impact ( p = 0.000), confirming that IOF is associated with reduced hospital stays.
Excerpts
The key ANOVA findings are as follows: Model significance: the overall model is highly significant ( F = 14.02, p = 0.000), explaining 85.38% of the total variation.
falciparum had highly significant (t = − 2.056, p = 0.000 ) MPO levels (2.378 ± 0.250) than participants that tested negative (1.721 ± 0.980).
This study attempts to analyze this difference and uses it to devise and validate an equation by which one can estimate the correct distance. The results of our study demonstrate a very strong, highly significant linear relationship between predicted and actual values of X ( r = 0.97, P = 0.000).
The difference between the phenotypic composition of each RDL genotype is highly significant ( χ 2 = 257, P = 0.00).
In female: 21–40, 42 features were significantly different between normal and overweight classes ( P < 0.05), and 11 of these features exhibited highly significant differences ( P < 0.0000).
The coefficient of the spatial auto-correlation was 0.55, which is highly significant in the models with p = 0, indicating the apparent neighborhood effects.
The final multivariate logistic regression model identified age as a highly significant risk factor for hypertension among people on ART (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.055-1.11, p=0.000).
As shown in Figure 4F, 4G there is a highly significant (Hypergeometric p=0) overlap between DMCs that differentiate cancer cell lines from NorHep and SAM triggered DMCs (∼30% of DMCs between cancer and normal cells were affected by SAM: SAM reduced the differences in methylation in ∼65% of these DMCs) (Figure 4G ).
A highly significant association was found between the oral hygiene and socioeconomic status (p=0.000).
Table 2 shows the mean difference of the sealants using the post hoc Tukey's test, where the F -value of 34.302 for the mean difference between the three groups of pit and fissure sealants was highly significant ( p = 0.000).
A very highly significant association ( P=0.000 ) was found between willingness to donate and knowledge of allowance of organ donation in religion.
Fisher Exact test was then employed in two consecutive steps: the first, an overall test, resulted in highly significant differences ( p = 0.000) and strong effect size (Cramer’s V = 0.57) among the routes.
All pairs demonstrate moderate to strong positive correlations (0.41 to 0.7), all highly significant (P=0.0), indicating that adjacent levels tend to follow a similar trend as the foraminal height increases or decreases at one level.
In patients with moderate head injury (GCS = 9–12), there was a significant improvement in GCS at the time of discharge in all the three groups ( P < 0.05), though changes at 24 h and at the time of discharge were highly significant in group HS 2 ( P = 0.00).
Bartlett’s test for sphericity was also highly significant (X 2 (190) =5,321; p=0.00).
It almost achieved significance for NG (22.9% vs 17.2%; P = 0 , 06 ).
The association between side effects and adherence showed a highly significant relationship ( P value = 0.000).
The w/b ratio has a highly significant effect ( p = 0.000, F = 24.02) and explains a large portion of the total variation.
Deviance coefficient for goodness of fit of model is 497.23 which is absolutely significant ( p -value=0.00).
The path coefficient for this relationship is 0.316, and it is highly significant (p-value = 0.000).
The correlation was highly significant ( p = 0.0000), indicating a strong positive relationship between these two variables, suggesting that plant height is positively associated with yield per plant.
In all analyses, a two-tailed probability, P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant and highly significant when ****P <0:0001.
All the current treated groups (Pro 4 and Pro 7 and a mixture of Pro 4 and Pro 7 strains) induced a highly significant elevation of circulating total IgA at 14 and 28 days comparing to the untreated group ( P = 0.000).
As shown in S10 Fig , the results of the randomization tests indicated that the markers in beta cells generally had higher ranking scores, and exhibited extremely significant differences compared to the ranking scores obtained through random assignment (with p < 0 . 0 0 1 ).