Excerpts

The statistical difference was apparent (P=0.000).

The statistic was 17,064 with 15 degrees of freedom, which was highly significant (p = 0.000).

At baseline level (pre-operatively), the difference in levels when compared concerning the biomarkers between test and control group, there was a highly significant difference with serum HbA 1c (P < 0.000), amylase (P < 0.000), total protein (P < 0.000), glucose (P < 0.000) except CRP (P < 0.085) which was not significant.

The difference between the PDS and RDS group at teenage was highly significant by t -test ( t (28) = 8.862, p < .000).

Among large-scale facilities, their annual operation was associated with a decreasing trend in the number of standing-dead trees ( p = 0.00) and more C stocks in live trees ( p = 0.01).

Note that the increase of CSR specialization from the pre-shock to the post-shock period is highly significant in the treatment group ( δ = 0.014, p = 0.000), which is considerably larger than the corresponding increase in the control group ( δ = 0.005, p = 0.058).

The student’s knowledge and awareness on cancer education scores were highly significant ( p = 0.000).

Statistical analysis revealed that the difference in the mean day of complete wound healing for the CE group was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.000).

Moreover, the correlation coefficient of the sequencing data and qRT-PCR result using β-actin as reference gene reached 0.992 (R 2 = 0.984) ( Figure 6 ), which was highly significant ( p < 0.000).

This is highly significant (p<0.000).

It can be seen from the table that there is a highly significant relationship between the age of students and their overall clinical stressors, as the overall stressors mean score increased with age group ( t = −15.382, p = 0.000).

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for plant height showed extremely significant differences between varieties (p = 0.0000) [ 31 ].

The one-tailed multinomial probability of 140,432 pairs being located on a vector is highly significant [Bin ( n = 211,426, k = 140,432, q = 0.08) = 990(z), p = 0].

Concerning the relationship between SoC and CP (hypothesis 6), the results in this study implied that a slightly significant correlation existed between students' perceived SoC and CP (β = 0.256, p < 0.0).

This analysis revealed highly significant differences between healthy and asymptomatic individuals for the variable “department of patrol” (Chi2 = 40.23; df = 14; p = 0.000).

When the length of the styloid process was compared between CT and Panoramic radiography, the p on the left side was significant ( p = 0.002), while the p on the right side and of the whole sample was highly significant ( p =0.000). whereas that in the right side and the whole sample were highly significant ( p = 0.000) [ Table 4 ].

Comparing T0 to T2, there was also a highly significant deterioration of − 13.9 dB on average (p < 0.000).

With these values, an ANOVA test returned a highly significant relationship ( p ~ 0.00) between observed and predicted erosivity values.

The average number of hospital visits for colicky pain were comparatively fewer in group B (0.45±0.67) than in group A (2.90±0.90), and this difference was highly significant (p=0.000).

In this case, the test statistics are highly significant (p = 0.0000).

A relationship of marginal significance between emotion to gender switch costs and the RT coefficient of variability (CV; β = −260.46521, p < 0.000) was found as well, which did not survive correction, and the overall model was significant [ R 2 = 0.12, adjusted R 2 = 0.07, F (15,75) = 2.318, p = 0.004].

Table 2 shows the mean difference of the sealants using the post hoc Tukey's test, where the F -value of 34.302 for the mean difference between the three groups of pit and fissure sealants was highly significant ( p = 0.000).

The increase was extremely significant for the deformity angle (initial vs. 6th month, p =0.000; 6th month vs. 24th month, p =0.000) and kyphotic angle (initial vs. 6th month, p =0.003; 6th month vs. 24th month, p =0.000) in the thoracic and thoracolumbar regions during the first 2 years of the disease process.

These differences were statistically highly significant ( p = 0.000; rho = 0.549).

Their difference is small but statistically extremely significant (t-test P -value ≈ 0).