The analysis revealed a highly significant main effect of the treatment group F ( 2 , 4 6 ) = 5 3 . 1 , p < 0 . 0 0 1 , with a large effect size (partial η p 2 = 0 . 7 0 ).
Excerpts
There was a highly significant relationship between pleural fluid, TTF-1, and lung adenocarcinoma (p=0.000).
The outcome was compared with that in appropriate untreated controls, group 17. As in the case of similar treatments applied to an initial tumour transplant of one million cells, Melphalan and isogenic cells prolonged host survival, although the results just failed to reach statistical significance at the 5 per cent level (group 15 versus group 17), t 2 1, n 19, P < 0 1 > 0 05.
The observed AUC-ROC (0.715) and measure of Se AUC-ROC (0.034), despite being highly significant (p-value ≈ 0.000) has limited potential to confer these genetic variants as predictors for athlete’s discrimination in the light of the obtained Kappa statistics and F1-measure.
In terms of the efficacy of each treatment in reducing Xcc symptoms, which was calculated based on the symptom severity scores as described in section 2.9, analysis of our data revealed a very highly significant difference between the treatments ( p = 0.000) ( Figure 10 ).
A highly significant correlation ( Figure 6 A, Spearman Rho = 0.68, P ≈ 0) was obtained between observed and expected values, suggesting that, in general, TEs tend to insert randomly in the genome.
The difference between the age groups in their susceptibility to the infection was highly significant ( P = 0.000).
The 50%FD had significant positive correlation with LTL ( r = 0.120, P = 0.013) and highly significant positive correlation with PH ( r = 0.606, P = 0.000), WTL ( r = 0.202, P = 0.000), and NIN ( r = 0.799, P = 0.000) but negative highly significant correlation with ExL ( r = −0.439, P = 0.000) and PeL ( r = −0.413, P = 0.000).
The correlation between minimum temperature and malaria disease prevalence is highly significant (r = 0.4586 p = 0.0).
congolense Mikese compared to negative control was highly significant ( P = 0.000).
At baseline level (pre-operatively), the difference in levels when compared concerning the biomarkers between test and control group, there was a highly significant difference with serum HbA 1c (P < 0.000), amylase (P < 0.000), total protein (P < 0.000), glucose (P < 0.000) except CRP (P < 0.085) which was not significant.
A highly significant effect of initial PS concentration ( P = 0.000), initial viable cell count ( P = 0.000) and combined effect of PS initial concentration and initial viable cell count ( P = 0.028) on E. hirae inactivation using MB is observed.
of marginal significancep < 0.000
A relationship of marginal significance between emotion to gender switch costs and the RT coefficient of variability (CV; β = −260.46521, p < 0.000) was found as well, which did not survive correction, and the overall model was significant [ R 2 = 0.12, adjusted R 2 = 0.07, F (15,75) = 2.318, p = 0.004].
The difference was statistically highly significant in the group receiving 25% sucrose and BF ( P <0.000).
However, there is a statistically highly significant difference when comparing Group III with Group I and Group II with P < 0.000 and < 0.001, respectively [ Table 1 ].
RT-qPCR In the experimental group, miRNA-34a revealed a decreasing trend, significantly different from the normal group ( t =−23.128, t =−12.029, and t =−6.039 on 30, 60, and 90 days, respectively; P=0.000).
In general, an increasing trend was found in the GIC group (1.05, 0.90 to 1.22) accompanied by substantial heterogeneity ( P = 0.000, I 2 = 68.7%), while the different types of cancer could still be heterogeneous sources by meta-regression ( P = 0.012).
A highly significant reduction ( p < 0.000 ) of TDS was observed in the effluent compared to influent samples. pH is defined as measure of hydrogen ion concentration. pH of the untreated sample was greater than 7 and were up to the maximum value of 10 as shown in Table 1 .
The difference between the experimental and control groups with respect to these measurements was statistically highly significant at 3 months ( P = 0.00) but not significant at 6 months ( P = 0.45) [ Table 1 ].
When comparing the scores, highly significant differences in the affective evaluations were reported for the motivational quote/comic comparison (T = 7.392, p = 0.000) and the influencer/comic comparison (T = 4.950, p = 0.000).
The results of the analysis of quarterly deliveries in the 77 health facilities indicated a decreasing trend in deliveries (slope = − 13.131, p = 0.00) during the 24 months preceding implementation of the policy.
The results in Table 6 indicate that all the factors and interaction effects were highly significant ( p < 0.000) except for “V 1 * V 2 ” with p < 0.086.
Furthermore, a contingency table shows a highly significant association (Chi square = 597.170, P = 0.000000) between haplotype and country ( Table 3 ).
A highly significant positive correlation of time until flowering and altitude of origin was observed for the outdoor-grown diploid plants ( R 2 = 0.505, P = 0.000) as well as a significant positive correlation for the other diploid study groups (cold treatment, R 2 = 0.240, P = 0.024; warm treatment, R 2 = 0.260, P = 0.026).
While platelets count before treatment was 15.46 ± 8.17×110 9 /L with highly significant ( p value= 0.000).