A significant 2.5-fold decrease in cellular ATP was observed upon AA AgNP exposure ( p = 0.0040) with a highly significant elevation in mt depolarization (3.3-fold vs. control; p < 0.0001).
Excerpts
This contrasts sharply with the highly significant differences noted in spleen size and splenocyte number ( P < 0.0001) of sTg MTAG mice compared with the wild-type controls.
The main effect of Age was highly significant with respect to accuracy (Figure 3 , F(1,58) = 11.9, p < 0.0001).
A slight increase in potassium (within normal reference ranges) was significant ( P < .05) and decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were highly significant ( P < .0001).
Results: Statistically extremely significant ( P < 0.0001) results were found in menstrual irregularities, obesity, and body mass index.
Second, the theta values were modeled as a smooth function using locally weighted regression to remove SNPs showing a significant trend and/or differences between plates (with P < 0.0001) [ 7 , 36 ].
From the statistical analysis, desirable determination coefficients ( R 2 ), 0.9858 for CPT and 0.9912 for BA, were obtained for the calculated model; the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05); and the highly significant level obtained for the model ( p < 0.0001) indicated that it was precise and applicable.
The correlation matrix shows a highly significant relationship ( r = 0.38–0.43, P < 0.0001) between all three scores (Table 4 ) indicating internal validity in scores assigned for each measure.
Thermal Detection Thresholds ANCOVA with age as a covariate (partialing out the highly significant age-related effects) revealed a highly significant effect of group (F 2,113 = 30.04, p<<0.0001), body side (ipsilateral vs. contralateral: F 1,113 = 12.39, p<0.001) and group x side interaction (F 2,113 = 4.65, p<0.05) for the cold detection threshold (CDT).
5 , N = 102 patients) revealed highly significant differences in SOZ and non‐SOZ channels ( P < 0.0001; Wilcoxon rank sum) in aggregate and in individual epilepsy patients ( N = 90, P < 0.0001, Sign test).
The difference between the microbiome profiles of these groups was highly significant ( p = 0.0001, F = 13.75) ( Fig 5B ).
The difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
This suggestion was confirmed by data within the Yellow River regions, where an increasing trend in seroprevalence for T. gondii ( P < 0.0001) was found from upstream western to midstream and downstream eastern regions.
The p-value indicates highly significant **** p < 0.0001 while p > 0.05 is considered not significant.
Kruskal-Wallis analysis revealed a highly significant difference among the groups ( P < 0.0001).
The ANOVA results ( Supplementary Table S1 ) demonstrated that the regression model was highly significant (F = 88.02, p < 0.0001).
The fat-graft group also showed highly significant differences when compared with the groups submitted to the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap ( p = 0.0001) and the platelet-rich fibrin gel techniques ( p = 0.016).
While it highly increased in poorly differentiated type (GIII) with significant statistically, P < 0.0001, and the difference in expression between moderately and poorly differentiated type highly significant, P < 0.0001 [ Table 1 ].
Because the surgery-by-histology interaction term was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), we conducted Kaplan-Meier and log rank analyses comparing survival curves between treatments separately within histologies.
Moreover, comparing pre-intervention assessment to 12 month (during treatment) assessment yielded that the improvement in all of the assessed indices was highly significant (p < 0.0001) for Visual Acuity, BUT, and Schirmer test for both eyes.
The mathematical models of Pb 2+ and Cd 2+ were extremely significant (p < 0.0001), and the determination coefficients were 0.9952 and 0.9887, respectively, indicating that these two models can explain of the change of response values, and provided a perfect fit of response surface.
Heterogeneity testing was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The effect of adapting speed was highly significant in ANOVA (F(2,8) = 142.57; p < 0.0001; effect size η 2 p = 0.97).
The model was highly significant (R2 = 0.62, p < 0.0001) and genotype ( p < 0.05), step frequency ( p < 0.0001) and hematocrit ( p < 0.05) were independent predictors of the 6-MWT distance.
rigaudi and marginally significant for E. artemiae ( t = −6.7 and −2.2, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.05, respectively).