Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The regression and correlation analyses between gestational age and the studied parameters were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Fetometry in Arabian horses.
Front Vet Sci · 2025 · PMC12588862
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Total AHSS scores at 1 h post-alcohol intake were 2.21 ± 1.10 in the HDB1098 group and 3.21 ± 2.30 in the placebo group, and those at 24 h post-alcohol intake were 3.21 ± 2.30 in the HDB1098 group and 7.79 ± 3.33 in the placebo group, showing a highly significant difference between the groups ( p < 0.0001) similarly to the AHS survey.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We mapped ∼54 million sequencing tags to the reference human genome (alignment details are presented in Supplementary Table S9 ) resulting in a highly significant correlation (Spearman correlation = 0.77, P < 0.0001) between the RPKM values and the microarray generated expression values ( Figure 6 C).
extremely significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualified
Nevertheless, there was disagreements about which type of PD might benefit more from MAO-B inhibitors, and an extremely significant disparity ( p < 0.0001) on familiarity with the use of disease-modifying/neuroprotective therapy (χ 2 ( N = 711) = 42.9005, p < 0.0001), Rivastigmine for PDD patients (χ 2 ( N = 711) = 20.2759, p < 0.0001), and antipsychotics for psychiatric symptoms managements (χ 2 ( N = 711) = 21.8987, p < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
At a higher dose (1%), the difference was highly significant (15.3 ± 3.7% treatment versus 84.5 ± 3.7% control, n = 10, p < 0.0001; 1.9 ± 0.8 and 8.3 ± 0.9 in treatment and control, respectively).
Odorant Inhibition in Mosquito Olfaction.
iScience · 2019 · PMC6660600
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the present study a two-way analysis of ANOVA (age × treatment) showed highly significant differences of age ( F 2, 78 = 43.43, p < 0.0001), treatment ( F 3, 78 = 61.01, p < 0.0001), and age × treatment interaction ( F 6, 78 = 8.706, p < 0.0001; Fig. 5 ).