Statistical analysis (ANOVA) confirms that these reductions are highly significant ( p < 0.0001 for both bacterial strains compared with the control), with LDPE-DB2 causing a significantly greater reduction than LDPE-DB26 ( p = 0.0011).
Excerpts
By 3-way ANOVA, time, environment, and age were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) for the recovery of performance on the inclined plane.
Three marker haplotype analyses revealed highly significant differences between CD patients and control subjects ( χ 2 = 29.9, df = 7, P = .0001) and UC cases and controls ( χ 2 = 46.3, df = 7, P < .0001).
In Table 3 , regular alcohol consumption by the spouse was found to have a highly significant association with both psychological violence (p = 0.0001) and physical violence (p = 0.0008).
There was a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) but only moderate correlation between both models ( r = 0.5 and r = 0.57 for a linear and non-linear model, respectively).
All 135 features exhibited highly significant between-class differences ( p < 0.0001), with the majority showing p-values very low.
A highly significant QTL (p < 0.0001) was detected on chromosome Z between microsatellite markers MCW258 and MCW241 (at 21.40 Mb and 34.26 Mb, respectively) [see Additional file 1 ].The effect of this locus was 15.28 HU.
When the herbivory index is bootstrapped for secondarily dominant plant hosts, which are represented by fewer than 100 specimens each, the herbivory index is even more highly variable (electronic supplementary material, figure S1). The difference in leaf surface area between CCP and MCF is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), but is not significant between individual plant hosts from the two localities (electronic supplementary material, table S2; figure S6).
After excluding asystole patients with presumed CO = 0 L/min, the association between PetCO 2 and CO remained highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
Most importantly, we found, in addition, a highly significant interaction [ F (2, 126) = 8.03, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.12] between both factors (see Figure 3B ).
Influence of object and side factors on the synergies There was a highly significant effect of the Factor “object” on the PCs scores which was statistically verified for the first three PCs ( F 72 8 = 12.680 , p <0.0001 for PC1, F 72 8 = 16.449 , p <0.0001 for PC2 and F 72 8 = 22.007 , p <0.0001 for PC3).
The Wilcoxon test determined there are highly significant differences in SHAPE reactivity between both groups (p<0.0001).
pipiens taxa and w Pip groups was highly significant (Fisher exact test, P < 10 -4 ), as shown with quinquefasciatus that appeared mainly infected with the w Pip-I group (133 of 201 individuals), pipiens with w Pip-II (55 of 118) and pallens with w Pip-V (19 of 20) (Table 3 ).
Measures depend on age-group overall [ F (1.79, 459.04) = 70.74; P < 0.0001] and a highly significant interaction is found between test and age group [ F (16.08, 459.04) = 17.84; P < 0.0001].
Bonferroni-corrected post hoc pairwise comparisons were all highly significant: 0 vs. 5 wt% (Δ = −7.12 MPa, p < 10 −4 ), 0 vs. 10 wt% (Δ = −9.99 MPa, p < 10 −4 ), and 5 vs. 10 wt% (Δ = −2.87 MPa, p < 10 −4 ).
Beginning at doses >50 mg/kg, CSE reduced TGF-β levels toward those of the control group, while simultaneously restoring E-cadherin expression, with highly significant increases at 100 and 150 mg/kg ( p < 0.0001).
culicifacies was lowest in plain villages as compared to dam, forest and foothill villages and this difference was highly significant (p<0.0001).
All these parameters exhibited a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001) between the right and left eye.
The difference in SARS-CoV-2 prevalence as shown in high- and low- or middle-income countries was highly significant (5.1% [1634/32,053] vs 21.6% [11,521/53,221], P<.0001).
Analysis of variance showed highly significant effects of genotype on both traits (PY: p < 0.0001; BLB: p < 0.0001), indicating considerable genetic variation among the lines.
In pancreas, the correlation between MRPS6 and HSP9A , HSPD1 , LONP1 and CLPP was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and strong (R = 0.68, 0.60, 0.65, and 0.49, respectively) (Fig. 2 B).
The statistical difference was highly significant for both LVIDDn (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.0001) and LA/Ao (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.0001).
Log-rank tests indicated highly significant differences across quartile groups ( p < 0.0001), suggesting that eGDR is a strong predictor of survival in hyperlipidemic individuals.
Referring to Table 3 , the improvement for FE625 over FE75 was significant for S1, S4, and S5, and the group mean showed a highly significant improvement of 12 percentage points (p = 0.0001).
There was a significant trend in the relationship between carotid IMT and HF across quartiles of IMT ( P <0.0001) in all 4 models.