Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that location was highly significant for all the traits ( p < 0.0001) except for plant height ( p < 0.001), leaf length (not significant), total seed weight ( p < 0.05), and yield ( p < 0.01) ( Table 5 ).
Excerpts
A linear mixed-effects model with stimulation rate and pulse shape (rampUp and rampDown) as fixed factors and subject as random factor reported a highly significant effect of rate ( F (1,117) = 478.44, p < .0001) but not of shape ( F (1,117) = 0.05, p = .8154) or the interaction between rate and shape ( F (1,117) = 0.03, p = .8559) on the angle.
The consistent differences between males of different ecotypes, with stream males generally scoring higher on PC1, remained highly significant (F = 25.9093, P<0.0001, df = 1, 110).
coluzzii populations An overall highly significant elevated levels of AChE (F 2, 237 = 55.93, P < 0.0001) and β-esterase (F 2, 237 = 159.0, P < 0.0001) activities were observed in both indoor and outdoor mosquito populations compared to the susceptible reference strain, Kisumu (Figs. 3 a–d).
Among the model terms, pH (A) and temperature (B) showed highly significant effects (p < 0.0001), while calcination time (C) was found to be statistically insignificant (p = 0.5976).
This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
SRCV and VP demonstrated a highly significant upregulation for IFIT1 , MX1 , APOBEC3G and MX2 as compared to late but not early treated individuals ((SRCV: p < 0·0001, p < 0·0001, p < 0·0001, and p < 0·0001, respectively) and (VP: p < 0·0001, p < 0·0001, p = 0·006, p = 0·0002, respectively; Fig. 2 )).
Pairwise estimates of population differentiation were all high and highly significant ( Table 5 , P = 0.0001).
The correlation between serum and saliva cortisol using the Salimetrics EIA is highly significant ( r = 0.91, p < 0.0001) (Salimetrics LLC, 2005).
Using a two-way ANOVA by population (control/migraine) and stimulus duration, the effect of stimulus duration was highly significant (p<0.0001) and the variation between individual subjects was significant (p = 0.0008).
The correlations between these measures are highly significant (Pearson p < 0.0001).
A highly significant negative correlation between RUNX3 and vimentin protein was observed in these gastric cancer samples ( P < 0.0001; Fig. 8 C).
The criterion for significance was set as p < 0.05, and highly significant differences in the statistics were accepted if p < 0.0001.
This increase was highly significant (p<0.0001).
Respiratory coupling above .25 Hz was highly significant ( p < .0001; Figure 3A ), whereas cardiac coupling above 1.7 Hz was modestly significant ( p < .0142; Figure 3B ). 3.1 Risk assessment model The individual seizure values underlying Figure S3 served as features for training a logistic model, producing propensity scores for each seizure, which further distinguished SUDEP from non‐SUDEP cases.
Independent analysis by paired Student’s t -test confirmed a highly significant increase in the percentage of anagen over telogen HF after 6 months ( p < 0.0001), as shown in Figure 1 b. 3.2.
This difference was highly significant during ages 4–9 years ( p < .0001), with the largest cluster volume (664 mm 3 ) in the left parahippocampal gyrus at age 9 years.
C2), S nn became very high (S nn = 0.87) and remained highly significant (P < 0.0001), demonstrating the high phylogeographic signal detected in the species across its distribution.
A significant trend in the reduction of implantation of mechanical vs. biological prostheses was observed during the study period ( p < 0.0001).
The results in Figure 8 show a highly significant correlation between the potency of both compounds in the cancer cell lines, with an R -value of 0.852 ( p < 0.0001 ).
Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05, and highly significant was defined as p < 0.0001.
For highly significant results where the exact value does not further impact scientific interpretation, p < 0.0001 is reported.
Effects of the Experimental Conditions on Salivary Cortisol The two-factor (Time x Group) between-design repeated ANOVA showed a significant interaction effect of Time x Group, F (2.07, 57.96) = 8.28, p = 0.001, and a main effect of Time, F (2.07, 57.96) = 8.82, p<0.0001, and, as expected, a highly significant effect of Group, F (1, 28) = 91.08, p<0.0001.
3b) , which is highly significant for CCL4 (p<0.0001, post test for linear trend).
The differences in the duration of clutch stages 2–4 were highly significant (F 2,18 = 861.20, p < 0.0001 and F 2,18 = 408.22, p < 0.0001, the most conservative and liberal estimates, respectively), as were those concerning their rate of embryonic development (F = 22.99, p < 0.0001), and neither of these varied significantly among females (stage duration more conservative: F 9,18 = 0.46, p = 0.88; stage duration most liberal: F 9,18 = 1.66, p = 0.17; embryonic development rate: F 9,18 = 0.92, p = 0.53) ( Figure 2 ).