Pooled left and right arm data were then compared between megachiropterans and microchiropterans and showed highly significant differences (T = - 8.77, P = 0.0001); and clear separation of measurements between the groups ( Fig 2C ).
Excerpts
The clustering observed was found to be highly significant, and we identified 159 unexpectedly large (at least 400 Kb; p<1e-04) clusters of divergent regions with a median size of 800 Kb ( Figure 3 ; Table S2 ).
It remains to be investigated whether recombination influences the MST algorithm used here in the same way, but a PHI test indicated highly significant levels of recombination in this dataset (p<0.0001).
As expected, we observed a highly significant inverse correlation between CAG repeat numbers and the AAO in a multivariate linear regression analysis ( P < 0.0001), both for the individual sub-cohorts (Supplementary Table S9) and combined cohorts of MJD patients (Fig. 1 e; Table 2 ; Supplementary Table S9).
The separation in the survival distributions for those with perfusion defects and those without perfusion defects was highly significant (log-rank p = 0.0001).
Quantitative analysis of the percentage of CD45+ tumor cells expressing CD38 in each condition revealed a highly significant decrease in the cells treated with αCD38 antibody ( p < 0.0001 by an unpaired t test) (Fig. 2D ).
4b , interaction plots from two-way ANCOVA confirm this observation, revealing a highly significant sex*PD interaction for PC2 ( P < 0.0001) and lack of significant sex- or PD-related differences or interaction for PC1.
Total NRI was 29.6% and was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Comparing all of the nine different chemical blends, there were highly significant differences (P<0.0001).
On the SCQ, the right lateral region showed a highly significant ( χ 2 = 21.82, p < 0.0001) age-by-region interaction.
This result was found to be highly significant [ F ( 1 , 29 ) = 40 . 442 , p < 0 . 0001 , η 2 = 0 . 5824 ].
Dextrose and yeast extract could act as limiting nutrients because the squared effects of the two variables were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Comparison of the difference in the proportion of FAERS reports with the NITL terms in drugs with and without the relevant labeling was nominally significant ( p < 0.0001; Kruskal–Wallis ChiSquare approximation).
herba-alba demonstrated a highly significant repellent effect against S. oryzae compared to the tablet-like formulation (F = 605.9; df = 1; p < 0.0001), with repellency increasing progressively over time (F = 14.48; df = 5; p = 0.0019).
Presynaptic knockdown of scat resulted in a highly significant increase in the number of boutons ( Fig. 2 A,B; 81% increase; P <0.0001).
The analysis of variance (ANOVA) shown in Table 5 confirms that the developed quadratic model is highly significant for predicting size add-on (%), with a model F -value of 86.77 and a p -value < 0.0001, indicating an excellent fit of the response surface model to the experimental data.
Females were 4.8 times more likely to experience neuropsychiatric symptoms than males, and the association was extremely significant (OR=4.851, 95% CI: 3.085–7.626, P <0.0001).
Results: In the present study, total 110 study subjects responded by completely filling out the questionnaire The total calorie and protein intake of the study subjects before and after giving intervention for three months was found to be highly significant (p-value < 0.0001).
The effect of mCPP was highly significant ( F 2.24 =29.0, P = 0.0001), but there was no interaction of drug and genotype.
A generalized additive model (GAM) fitted to the normalized data revealed strong non-linear temporal structure in activity under all light treatments, with highly significant treatment-specific smooths of time (all F > 380, all p < 0.0001), explaining 97.6% of the variance in normalised activity (adjusted R 2 = 0.97).
2D ), a highly significant reduction in the invasion rate of 99% (Student's t-test; P<0.0001).
The preference of aroma of feeding males was highly significant (G = 22.64, p < 0.0001 by males and G = 48.50, p < 0.0001 by females) by both sexes ( Figure 1 ).
In contrast, compared to α IIb β 3 , both α v β 3 and α 5 β 1 reveal a highly significant reduction of overall contacts by ~10% ( p < 0.0001) (Fig.
We performed a sensitivity analysis to test the reliability of the meta-analysis, which showed that removing any one study would not lead to a marginally significant difference between the two groups ( P < 0.0001; Supplementary Figs. 35–36 ).
Based on 20 independent runs, a paired t-test on accuracy values confirms a highly significant difference (t(19) = 55.37, p < 0.0001), providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis.