Excerpts

In non-spatial linear models lichen cover showed highly significant differences by distance classes (F = 7.7, p<0.0001).

Comparison of the IHC and single-plex immunofluorescence revealed highly significant positive correlations between the cell densities of CD8, CD68, CD16, PD-L1 and SOX10 marker positive cells (Spearman’s rho = 0.927 to 0.750, p < 0.0001).

This decrease ( Figure 2 ) was highly significant compared to WT ( p < 0.0001) and was not significantly higher than the background switching at time zero ( p > 0.9999).

Compared with the NC group, the TAA-treated group presented a highly significant increase in the serum total and direct bilirubin concentrations ( P <0.0001).

Comparison of the difference in the proportion of FAERS reports with the NITL terms in drugs with and without the relevant labeling was nominally significant ( p < 0.0001; Kruskal–Wallis ChiSquare approximation).

Exercise tolerance There was a highly significant variance in the exercise duration (expressed as percent compared to baseline) in the five groups (F = 93.3, P < 0.0001, Fig. 5 ).

As presented in Figure 1B , a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001 ) was observed in the bodyweight of H. manillensis at different growth stages, with the larval stage weighing 0.081 ± 0.031 g, young 1.922 ± 0.563 g, and adults 8.329 ± 2.100 g.

Based on these results, the pooled data revealed that there was a highly significant effect of line on the l -carnitine content of breast and thigh meat from KICs (p<0.0001).

Interestingly, post hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction returned a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) difference between the pure DMEM and each of the tested cell lines, showing that the sensor is capable of detecting adherent cells with respect to medium only, with the resonant frequency of the medium containing cancer cells being consistently lower than that of pure DMEM.

In contrast, 17.5% of all phosphothreonine sites were dephosphorylated during mitotic exit, a highly significant enrichment compared to 10.6% of phosphoserine sites that were dephosphorylated (χ 2 test, P < 0.0001).

The difference between both conditions, however, proves to be highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with a higher average correlation length in the presence of fluid shear stress of 33.3 μm, compared to 24.1 μm in the case of no fluid flow.

Contemporaneous and between person models The within-person contemporaneous network was also dense with most associations highly significant (p < 0.0001).

In addition, these remained highly significant after exclusion of outliers ( r = −0.525, p < 0.0001 and r = −0.507, p < 0.0001, respectively; Figure 2 b).

Heat killed parasites failed to induce IFNλ at any timepoint assessed, and at 72 hours post infection, the difference in IFNλ production compared to controls was highly significant ( Fig 3A , p < 0.0001, Two-way ANOVA).

The relationship between this calculated projected area (PA) and the true leaf area should diminish over time, as plant architecture and leaf self-shading cannot be corrected from a single photo; however, correlations between average PA and average biomass remained highly significant on day 14 ( r = 0.67; P < 0.0001).

The statistical heterogeneity was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), with prevalence rates ranging from 32 to 74%.

In this experimental setup, a highly significant difference after treatment between week 0 and 1 was found in the CCl 4 group, resulting in a medium-sized effect (W = 62.5, p value < 0.0001, r CCl4 = 0.64).

Interestingly, over 30% of our RA cohort displayed anti-IL-2/IRF5 Abs in a highly significant double positivity ( p < 0.0001) and a more frequent multiple seroreactivity was observed in RA patients compared to healthy controls (Table 1 ).

Notably, the difference was extremely significant compared with the untreated control group (**** p < 0.0001). 2.5.

The correlation between Δ7 SMN baseline and Δ7 SMN at one year was less than flSMN, but still highly significant (p<0.0001).

All models were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

All the psychosocial factors— perceived social norms, conditions facilitating CIM, affect, perceived consequences for patients and staff, descriptive norms, structural facilitating conditions, past behaviour and personal normative beliefs —were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Level of correlation between IHI and PNGIMR on KD60 and M24 in WHO cone bioassays Correlation between IHI and PNGIMR results was statistically highly significant but with a stronger association between M24 results (r = 0.9, p < 0.0001, n = 20) than between KD60 results (r = 0.6, p = 0.002, n = 20) (Fig. 3 ).

IG# showed a highly significant difference between non-infected and infected patients early in period 1 and period 5, ( P < 0.0001).

albicans , where this reduction was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).