Excerpts

This trend was progressively accentuated at weeks 8 and 12 (W8, W12), when the differences between DM+ and DM– were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

This difference was highly significant ( Table 6 ) for both severe (p<0.0001) and less-severe (p<0.0001) complication groups.

Response bias (C) We observed a highly significant reduction in response bias in the L+T condition as compared to the baseline L condition ( Fig. 3 b, paired t -test: t (7) = 6.37, P < 0.0001).

One-way ANOVA shows a highly significant difference between Fgr, Fyn, Hck and Lyn expression levels relative to Blk (p < 0.0001), while Src, Yes and Lck are not significantly different ( Fig 1A ).

The type of test used was highly significant (p<0.0001) for milk production, probably because the data used in the meta-analysis included one-day tests as well as 305-day tests.

Overall genetic structure Control region and microsatellites AMOVAs with the CR and Msat datasets showed highly significant deviations from panmictic population conditions (Φ ST = 0.096, P < 0.0001; mean D est = 0.17; F ST = 0.015, P < 0.0001).

As shown in Figure 1 a,b, there was a highly significant correlation between results from the sVNT and the live-virus NTs for both variants (Spearman’s r = 0.92 and r = 0.80 for WT and Omicron, respectively, both p < 0.0001).

Two-tailed test of independence indicated that the association between the mortality and PBO pre-exposure is highly significant (χ 2 = 84.51, df = 1, p < 0.0001).

From the variance analysis, it is shown that the p -value of the regression model is extremely significant ( p < 0.0001).

Patients showed an increasing trend for the prevalence of hepatic steatosis with fibrosis stage (Figure 1 (a), p = 0.0001).

Irradiated samples treated with 5-ALA of 50 or 100 μg/ml showed highly significant ( p < 0.0001) reductions in cell viability compared to the irradiated 5-ALA-free controls, decreasing progressively with increasing light doses from 0 to 32 J/cm 2 .

This analysis reproduced the highly significant effect of synchrony (F 1,145.96 = 34.9, p < 0.0001) already found in the 2 × 2 type B model.

Differences between normal and obese subjects for insulin, CRP, adiponectin and leptin were all highly significant (p<0.0001).

The results are statistically highly significant WOMAC osteoarthritis index at V1: (4.24 ± 1.94/6.19 ± 1.79; p < 0.0001, t test and Wilcoxon test), not significant at V2: p = 0.1636, highly significant at V3: p = 0.0009, and significant at V4: p = 0.0123 (Fig. 4 ).

Regardless of such variability in RA patients, there was a clearly significant difference between both groups (RA mean 1.2 ± 3.18% [0–19.50%] vs. healthy control mean 0.07 ± 0.1% [0–0.59%], p < 0.0001, Fig. 3 b upper panel).

The results demonstrated that the model is highly significant ( P < 0.0001, F = 273.5) with a non-significant lack-of-fit ( P = 0.6251), confirming the adequacy and excellent fit of the model.

Effect of perturbation direction on response The effect of perturbation direction (anterior/posterior and left/right) on the amplitude of the hand displacement was highly significant ( F (1,16) = 187, p <0.0001).

After lockdown, in the SRQ positive cases, sex, educational status, COVID-19 positive cases and death due to COVID-19 among family members were highly significant (p = 0.0001) factors.

The correlation between host- and Symbiodiniaceae δ 13 C values was strong and highly significant ( rho = 0.80; P < .0001) ( Fig. 2D ).

The difference is highly significant (mean number of kin: 16.4 ± 11.9 vs 5.8 ± 8.8; F 1,322 = 82.72, p < 0.0001).

An unpaired t-test between PPG-based (mean = 140 ms, SD = 10 ms, n = 116) and our measurement (mean = 98.3 ms, SD = 16.9 ms, n = 18) confirms a highly significant difference between the distributions; t(132) = 16.75, p < 0.0001.

Serum levels of FRA, MSLN, MPF, and creatinine are shown in Table 3 and demonstrate a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) discrimination between healthy subjects and renal disease subjects, evaluated as a single cohort.

Even after accounting for the fact that we are comparing different levels of albuminuria with the same control group by using the Bonferroni correction, the pooled estimates of microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria remained highly significant (both p < 0.0001 after Bonferroni correction).

We found a highly significant increase in synaptic abnormalities in oocytes from BPA-exposed females (16.0% versus 52.0% of cells in placebo and BPA, respectively; χ 2 = 134.8; p < 0.0001; Figure 1 A), largely attributable to increases in two categories of abnormality: “incomplete synapsis,” in which a single chromosome pair remained unsynapsed in an otherwise normal pachytene cell (0.5% in placebo versus 11.0% in BPA; Figure 1 C), and cells with end-to-end associations between nonhomologous SCs (7.7% in placebo versus 25.6% in BPA; Figure 1 D).

Averaged across the three settings, the mean Clarity ratings of the four sound scenarios were 62.0 (Scenario 9), 43.9 (Scenario 10), 52.9 (Scenario 11), and 35.1 (Scenario 12), and the ANOVA showed a highly significant main effect of Scenario ( p < .0001, see Table 3 ).