Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The heterogeneity test yielded a highly significant result ( Q = 1052, df = 20, P < 0.0001, τ2 (between-study) = 1417, τ2 (within-study) = 12029), with 89.46% of the total variance ascribed to within-study variation and 10.5% to between-study differences, indicating substantial biological and methodological variability among included studies.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Simultaneously, the results from Table 2 reveal that the individual factors A and D exert a highly significant influence on the response value ( p < 0.0001), while factors B and C exhibit a significant impact ( p < 0.05).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Co-infection analysis showed a highly significant association with HIV (p<0.0001, OR=26.32, 95% CI: 20.22-34.28).
Poster Abstracts
Asian J Transfus Sci · 2025 · PMC12662610
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Stepwise regression with the equilibrium genetic correlation as the dependent variable and the parameters , , G ratio , P ratio , ν , N , and their interactions as independent variables produced a highly significant model ( F 15,885 = 556.9, P < 0.0001) that accounted for 90.4% of the variance in the equilibrium genetic correlations.
a near-significant trendp < 0.00010.0× alphagold
Therefore, the interaction effect of genotype and feeding regimen reached statistical significance for latency time (F(1, 25) = 45.90, p < 0.0001 and F(1, 25) = 10.47, p = 0.0034, respectively), whereas a near-significant trend was evident for the number of buried marbles (F(1, 22) = 33.06, p < 0.0001 and F(1, 22) = 3.943, p = 0.05970, respectively).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Among LAC patients with additional tissue section available for next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based analysis, 26/193 (13.5%) patients found positive for even low-rate EGFR-T790M mutated alleles at baseline were associated with a highly significant lower survival in comparison to those without (8.7 vs. 47.4 months, p < 0.0001).
highly significantP<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
No significant correlation was found with Dukes' stage (P= 0.15), but a highly significant correlation was obtained with DNA index > 1.30 (P<0.0001) as well as 17p loss (P< 0.002). p53 content was also significantly different when it was compared to tumour site (P<0.03), with a considerably reduced incidence in the proximal colon (42.1% positive cases) compared to an average of 74.8% in the distal seg- ments. r- U- 0 30 60 FL2 b 0 30 60 FL2 C 0 30 60 FL2 Figure 4 p53/DNA FCM results for a tumour of the rectum (DNA index 1.15).