Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP -value < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
No significant differences in the prognostic value are noted between iPET-2 and i-PET-4 with both showing highly significant differences in EFS between the CMR and nCMR patients ( P -value < 0.0001): patients with iPET-2-CMR and iPET-2-nCMR had 3-y-EFS’s of 93.1% and 45.5%, respectively while the respective values for patients with iPET-4-CMR and iPET-4-nCMR were 89.5 and 39.4%.
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
At 12 weeks, the investigators noted a highly significant difference in mean percentage change in tumour size between the study and control groups (–20% vs . +19%, P <0.0001).
Renal cell carcinoma: how to hit the targets?
Cent European J Urol · 2014 · PMC3992446
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The vedolizumab group (n = 15) showed a significant increase ( P = 0.007) despite greater variability in baseline concentrations, while the anti-TNF group (n = 14) demonstrated a more uniform response pattern with highly significant increases ( P < 0.0001).
a decreasing trendP < 0.00010.0× alphagold
The incidence rate showed a rapidly increasing trend from 1975 to 1987, with an APC of 3.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.8–3.9%, P < 0.0001), while this increase slowed from 1988 to 2001 (APC = 0.8%, 95% CI = 0.4–1.1%, P < 0.0001), and was followed by a decreasing trend from 2002 to 2016 (APC= −0.7%, 95% CI= −0.9% to −0.5%, P < 0.0001).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A Pearson’s correlation between the dynamic rate changes in the oximeter signals reveals a highly significant inverse correlation for phosphorescence changes ( r = −0.597; 95% confidence, −0.710 to −0.454; P < 0.0001) and a highly significant positive correlation for changes in pO 2 ( r = 0.594; 95% confidence, 0.451 to 0.707; P < 0.0001).