(20.6) 255 (79.4) 321 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 Subtotal 215 (18.8) 930 (81.1) 1,145 98 (17.1) 474 (82.9) 572 Children's Health * Low birth weight and cooking smoke in Guatemala Environmental Health Perspectives * VOLUME 110 | NUMBER 1 | January 2002 111 combined and between clean fuels and open fire users are highly significant (p < 0.0001).
Excerpts
The PADIT risk score was found to be highly significant ( P < 0.0001), with an estimated hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.28 (95% CI 1.22, 1.33) ( Table 3 ); thus, the relative risk of a major CIED infection increased by 28% for each one unit increase in PADIT risk score.
In the case of the alpha waves, there was a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) reduction in the bandpower of all the alcohol treatment groups, in comparison with the control group.
These differences between etofenamate and placebo treatment were statistically highly significant ( p value < 0.0001).
Correlations between MVP and Other Markers/Proteins of Inflammation A highly significant correlation was found between MVP levels and Neu, CRP, and IL-6 (r = 0.48; p < 0.0001, r = 0.42; p < 0.0001, r = 0.36; p = 0.0004, respectively; Figure 7 ), whereas a less-significant correlation was demonstrated between MVP levels hBD-1 (r = −0.25; p = 0.0170).
There was a highly significant difference among the percentages of mating combinations in 2010 (F (3,28) = 56.59, p < 0.0001), with significantly more NN couples (43.99 ± 1.70%) forming relative to all other couples, together with significantly more SN heterotypic couples forming relative to the reciprocal NS.
The strongest predictor of adult alcohol problems was whether one felt drunk at first episode and this was highly significant in all analyses, including the multivariable model with the most rigorous adjustment for confounders (regression coefficient: 0.3848, p<0.0001).
This difference was highly significant by the two-tailed t test ( P < 0.0001) for each of the two data sets.
LRTI was also more frequent during the HBoV1 primary infection (5%) than during the next interval (0%) but was too rare for the difference to reach significance; however, when combined with URTI, the difference was highly significant (p<0.0001).
While the differ- ence in trichocyst content is highly significant (p < 0.0001), the amount of membranes fused is not different (even at p > 0.1; determined by U-test). dure (a serious risk, as we had learned in pilot experiments with commercial equipment) might have hampered its more general use.
Then, a two-way ANOVA factorial analysis revealed that the clinical state of the patients’ plasmas tested (“steady state” versus “acute phase”) had a highly significant effect ( p < 0001) on PS-exposure quantification.
RSPM performance (M = 62%, SD = 21%) was highly varied across participants, and linear modeling indicated a highly significant relationship between RSPM accuracy and both D’ sensitivity for texts (b = 0.81, p = .0001) and overall judgment accuracy for comments (b = 0.29, p = .0001).
Finally, site had a highly significant effect on flower height above ground level (X 2 = 344.16, df = 2, p <0.0001).
After chemotherapy, we observed a highly significant decline of DNA content in the LMWF to a median value of 380 ng/ml (range 40 – 1790 ng/ml) (p = 0.0001).
These results were independent of LPS stimulation, and the differences against control experiments were highly significant ( p < 0.0001). 2.5.
The results of the ELISA and the relative density of the ICT showed a highly significant correlation (rs:0.935; p < 0.0001).
Specifically, rmpA , rmpA2 , and iucA showed the strongest associations, with absolute differences in reporting frequency exceeding 20 percentage points and highly significant statistical support ( p < 0.0001 for all comparisons).
Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant association between diffuse p53 protein expression and p53 missense mutation in these tumours (Table 6; Chi-squared, P < 0.0001).
We found that, within each scale at 10 h APF, a highly significant difference ( t test for two-independent samples; p < 0.0001) between actin-bundle areas was found.
In contrast, 12 of the 43 (B6× Ads )F 2 progeny exhibited the white-spotting phenotype, showing a highly significant deviation from the expected 2:1 ratio for a simple autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with homozygous embryonic lethality (χ 2 =29.07, P <0.0001).
Provisionally significant genes (adjusted P < 0.0001) were analyzed for enrichment of KEGG pathway membership; enrichment was assessed for genes that showed increased or decreased methylation values separately.
There was a highly significant linear correlation between the pore density of B. spissa and B. subadvena from Peru, Costa Rica, and Sagami Bay (R 2 = 0.93, p < 0.0001, Fig. 4 b).
The decrease in the incidence of CDI in the second period compared to the first period was highly significant (0.11% vs. 1.21% respectively; p = 0.0001) ( Figure 1 ).
In all the models considered at any step, both predictors describing Zebra Mussel occurrence (Dpa and Dpd) were highly significant, implying the strong dependence of Scaup density on the extent of occurrence and density of Zebra Mussels (in the final model Dpa: edf = 2.104, F = 14.532, p < 0.0001, Dpd: edf = 2.546, F = 4.844, p = 0.0048).
The Top ICH genes had highly significant and similar associations within the primary cluster that included intratumoral densities of CD45 + (r = 0.53–0.67, all p < 0.0001), CD8 + T cells (r = 0.48–0.71, all p < 0.0001, Fig. 3 B), CD20 + B cells (r = 0.47–0.56, all p < 0.0001), and CD138 + cells (0.37–0.5, all p < 0.0001, Additional file 1 : Table S1).