We observed a highly significant decrease ( P = 0.0001) in its expression following the cyclical induction of the Yamanaka factors.
Excerpts
The two main effects (primer and treatment) and their interaction were all highly significant (P < 0.0001).
All regressions were highly significant (P-value < 0.0001), indicating that the relationships between Ct values and viral genome quantity were statistically robust.
As shown in Table 3 , the model was highly significant (P < 0.0001)and statistically significant.
Regression analyses of all data collected from 2006–2009 for swarming start times (Figure 5 A&B) and end times (Figure 5 C&D) on the concurrent times of local sunset found a highly significant correlation between swarm times and sunset for both species (p < 0.0001, Table 1 ).
The t-value from the student's paired t-test was 19, indicating a moderately significant difference (p = 0.0001, S).
A consistent decline in the number of AK lesions from day 3 to day 29 was observed for all three active treatments, and the difference between active treatments and vehicle was highly significant at day 57 ( p <0.0001) [ Table 1 ].[ 11 ] The severity of local skin reactions in the active treatment groups followed a dose-dependent pattern, peaked between days 3 and 8 then largely resolved by day 15.
In total, about a two-fold increase in seeds was observed in reduced tillage plots (7936 seeds m −2 ) compared to ploughing (3846 seeds m −2 ) in the 0–20 cm topsoil layer, which was highly significant (ANOVA, F-value 24.5, p < 0.0001).
Similarly, at 3, 4, 5 and 6 h postoperatively, the incidence and severity of CRBD in group B was much lower than in Group A, which was statistically highly significant with a P value < 0.0001 [ Table 2 ].
Quantitation of the dispersal of the TGN in SS-RARP2 transfected cells confirmed that the TGN disruption was highly significant (p < .0001) when compared to cells transfected with Iowa-RARP2-GFP, SS-RARP2-C109A-GFP, or EGFP ( S6B Fig ).
Among the four primary tumor types described, we observed a significant trend toward improved cPFS with anti-PD1+anti-CTLA4 ICI versus anti-PD1 alone in mucosal melanoma (p=0.0001, figure 4C ).
As shown in Additional file 2 , overall, a highly significant positive correlation was found between gene and protein expression of TLR8 ( r = 0.86, P < 0.0001).
At higher concentrations (≥10 μM), these differences became highly significant across all comparisons (all p < 0.0001), with progressively larger reductions in viability observed in HEYA8 cells relative to non-tumor cell lines.
The additive effects of these PG1-6A1 -associated genetic variants were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.0001) and greater than their dominance effects, which were significant for three of the five genetic variants ( p ≤ 0.05).
Whereas all the other groups showed a decreasing trend in comparison to the diabetic group with adjusted ( p < 0.0001****).
melanogaster males were used as focal males, there was again a highly significant effect of rival treatment on the subsequent mating duration of focal D. melanogaster males (KW χ 5 2 = 35.714 , p < .0001; Figure 2 c).
Both analyses showed a highly significant correlation with a p -value of <0.0001 each.
Bartlett's test of sphericity, which is sensitive to smaller sample sizes, was highly significant ( p > 0.0001) ( Worthington and Whittaker, 2006 ).
The overall prevalence of anti-HBc was 7.0%, with an increasing trend with age, from 0% in 18–20 years old group to 17.9% in 51–60 years old group ( χ 2 = 46.7965, p < .0001).
A highly significant (p < 0.0001) reduction in Fn/c was observed between GFP-Vpr 1–96 (Fn/c ~2.4) and GFP-Vpr A6-2 (Fn/c ~0.9) indicating a reduction in nuclear accumulation.
The difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), although PASI scores were often low.
The regression of the distance between F ST and geographic distance in km was highly significant for all population comparisons (males collected in early summer, R 2 = 0.51, p < 0.0001; females collected in early summer, R 2 = 0.60, p < 0.0001; males collected in late summer R 2 = 0.71, p < 0.0001; females collected in late summer R 2 = 0.65, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2 a-d).
Specifically, the linear effect of X 1 , X 2 shows to be highly significant ( p ‐value <.0001).
The models were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), and the “Lack of Fit” of the models were not significant ( P > 0.05), which demonstrated the RSA and improved DMD were proper parameters representing the starch digestibility of the broilers, and the models were applicable to the optimization of exogenous carbohydrases for higher RSA and improved DMD in diets for the broilers.
3.2 Size diversity of cattle between assemblages The LSI values with over 10 observations revealed a highly significant difference in size between the cattle populations divided by assemblages and periods ( χ 2 = 82.7, p < .0001).