Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The frequency of MN induced in bone marrow erythrocytes of Cd exposed toads was highly significant ( p <0.0001; r=0.69) with 1.93, 2.31, 4.63, 6.16 and 9.00 folds (corresponding to 5, 10, 25, 50 and 75 % of Cd concentrations respectively) increase than the negative control (Figure 2 (Fig. 2) ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A highly significant positive correlation of first two principal axes ( f1 and f2 ) with U% ( f1 = 0.411, f2 = 0.187; p < 0.0001), and negative correlation with A%( f1 = -0.149, f2 = -0.168; p < 0.0001) and C% ( f1 = -0.379, f2 = -0.111; p < 0.0001), indicates that compositional constraints (especially U and C nucleotides) affected the codon usage bias of the SARS-CoV-2 genome (Table S3).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
While the patterns of coverage seem to indicate a notable bias in the per-site distribution of the coverage depth across coding genes for the SOLiD data, a moderate, but highly significant ( r = 0.25, P < 0.0001) correlation was observed between per base coverage by SOLiD and Solexa/Illumina sequencing for individual positions in the coding sequences of the 37 genes of mitochondrial ancestry—possibly due to a known dependence of recovery of fragmented cDNA (by gel elution) on GC content ( 35 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In these samples, we previously reported a highly significant positive correlation between the 71A1/3D6 oligomer values and both total tau ( r = 0.71, * p < 0.0001; Fig 3A ) and phospho‐tau 181 ( r = 0.70, * p < 0.0001; Pearson correlation coefficients; Fig 3B ) and no significant correlation with Aβ1‐42 monomer levels (Fig 3C ). 21 A separate cohort of control CSFs from 40 young (mid‐30s), healthy control individuals was also assayed, and their CSF 71A1 oAβ levels were compared with the patients from the BWH MAC cohort after further stratification.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
At a higher dose (1%), the difference was highly significant (15.3 ± 3.7% treatment versus 84.5 ± 3.7% control, n = 10, p < 0.0001; 1.9 ± 0.8 and 8.3 ± 0.9 in treatment and control, respectively).
Odorant Inhibition in Mosquito Olfaction.
iScience · 2019 · PMC6660600