Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Concerning attention behavior during familiarization, a repeated-measures ANOVA with looking time as dependent measure, language group (Catalan, Spanish, bilingual) and familiarization condition (TB or GM) as a between-group factors and trial (first, last) as repeated measures revealed a highly significant effect of familiarization trial [ F (1, 48) = 42.9; p = 0.0001; η 2 = 0.47], and no effect of language group or condition and no significant interactions [familiarization trial × language group: F (2, 48) = 1.15; p = 0.32; η 2 = 0.04; familiarization trial × condition: F (1, 48) = 1.7; p = 0.19; η 2 = 0.03; familiarization trial × language group × condition: F < 1].
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The comparison of pre- versus post-flight values revealed that bodyweight increased in the flight group (8%, p = 0.0010), ground control (4%, p = 0.0456) and control vivarium groups (11%, p<0.0001) with overall effect of “time” being highly significant (F(1,104) = 59.79, p<0.0001).
a positive trendp=0.00010.0× alphagold
Relative to Period 1 and after further adjustment for sex, age, and race/ethnicity, the ANA prevalence OR was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.84-1.24) for Period 2 and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.23-1.82) for Period 3 ( Table 2 ), and there was strong statistical evidence of a positive trend in ANA prevalence over time (p=0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The relationship of vegetation cover to dNDMI is highly significant (p < 0.0001) in both the red-stage and gray-stage sample subset, but the slopes of the relationships are opposite. dNDMI is positively correlated to NDVI 2015 in red-stage models, indicating that lower values of dNDMI (indicating greater mortality from spruce beetle outbreak) are correlated with lower vegetation cover in 2015.
highly significantp ≤ 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The level of significance ( p -value) for each test is indicated in the figures using the following notation: ns ( p > 0.05)—non-significant, * (0.01 < p ≤ 0.05)—significant, ** (0.001 < p ≤ 0.01)—very significant, *** (0.0001 < p ≤ 0.001)—highly significant, and **** ( p ≤ 0.0001)—extremely significant. 5.
highly significantP = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Logistic regression analysis further showed a highly significant ( P = 0.0001) inverse correlation between continence achievement rate and baseline incontinence severity. 9 Results of a retrospective analysis of data from the Solifenacin and Tolterodine extended-release as an Active comparator in a Randomised (STAR) trial 10 showed that overactive bladder patien