Excerpts

Statistical implication was set at the highly significant level of P <0.0001.

Finally, all species showed a trend towards lower FFFs at night compared with during the day, irrespective of stimulus intensity ( p < 0.0001 for day versus night for bright stimulus and day versus night for dim stimulus for all species; electronic supplementary material, table S3) (c) .

There was a highly significant difference in pN/pS between gene categories (Kruskal–Wallis test: χ 2 = 77.9, df = 6, P < 0.0001; Fig. 2c ).

The results from OSCE 2 were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) when comparing the two methods.

The difference between the obese ZDF group and the STZ-treated WT group was highly significant ( fa/fa : liver +45%, p < 0.0001; kidney + 64%, p < 0.0001).

The mesh count raw data (Figure 2 C) show that 40 nM Ov -GRN-1 increased the mesh count from the medium only control of 9.7–15.7 meshes—a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) relative increase over the blank control of 62% (Figure 3 A).

According to t‐test statistics, SGCD significantly outperformed all other methods, with differences reaching the highly significant level of p< 0.0001 ( **** ) (Figure 4C ).

The Satorra–Bentler scaled χ 2 difference test was highly significant (Δχ 2 (21)= 1250, p <.0001), with ΔCFI = –.14 and ΔRMSEA = +.035, both exceeding recommended thresholds for meaningful deterioration in fit (Cheung & Rensvold, 2002; Chen, 2007).

Phenotypic diversity, relationships, and heritabilities ANOVA revealed highly significant ( P < 0.0001) genotype and genotype x environment interaction effects for δ 13 C, [N], and C/N ratio.

Boxplot analysis revealed highly significant differences between healthy individuals and stage IV patients ( P < 0.0001), as well as between stage III and stage IV groups ( P < 0.05) (Fig. 6 C).

This linear trend of increasing total STarT-G score with an increasing number of somatic symptoms was highly significant (Jonckheere–Terpstra test, P < 0.0001).

Results Of the ten pairs of measures, eight pairs exhibited highly significant (p<0.0001) correlations while two pairs - (i) PE and FD, (ii) WE and LZ - did not significantly correlate ( Table 1 and Table 2 ).

A significant association with N (p < 0.01), indicating a higher anxiety trait score, and evidence of highly significant between-study heterogeneity (p < 0.0001, I 2 = 74%) were found in the S allele carriers group.

Factor analysis of 251,877 interception data points produced a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value of 0.726 (>0.5) and a highly significant result in Bartlett’s sphericity test ( P <0.0001).

We used the adonis2 function in the qiime2 plugin (q2-diversity) to perform permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) with 999 permutations, and the included interaction terms (see Table S3 in the supplemental material) and separation of the groups were highly significant ( P = 0.0001).

There has also been a significant trend toward prolonged survival time in patients treated on the control arms initiated over the entire period of the analysis (1972 to 1993, P=0.0001).

Similarly, the percentage of positive fields for IL-13Rα2 expression in 2+ and 3+ positive specimens in IHC analysis demonstrated a highly significant trend in these specimens (well differentiated = 35.0%, moderately differentiated = 82.0% and poorly differentiated = 94%; exact p < 0.0001) compared to PDAC samples with negative values of IL-13Rα2 (≤ 1+) ( Figure 1 D).

The biophysical factors, including land preparation and cropping system, showed highly significant (P < 0.0001) associations with ascochyta blight intensity in the logistic model as a single variable, and they also maintained their associations with both incidence and severity when included into the reduced variable model ( Table 3 ).

All relations were highly significant (all P < 0.0001).

Although all four correlations were highly significant ( P <0.0001), by using g s the regression coefficients became higher, in agreement with previous surveys suggesting g s as a reference parameter ( Medrano et al. , 2002 ; Flexas et al. , 2004 ).

The two-way ANOVA analyses showed highly significant P at both 5 and 8 months ( P < 0.0001, Fig. 2 ).

Its actual total was 501 papers, 1.53 times the expected value, and the difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.01% on the Poisson distribution with one degree of freedom).

Statistical modelling of FICI values The results of the Wald χ 2 tests from the fitted linear mixed-effects model evaluating FICI values indicated that antibacterial combination had a strong and highly significant main effect on FICI values ( p < 0.0001), as did compound ratio ( p < 0.0001), indicating that both the identity of the combination and the dosage ratio influenced the degree of synergism.

This relationship was highly significant; the overall average ranking score for health benefits was significantly greater than all other factors (Friedmans test X 2 4 = 91.72, p < 0.0001, post-hoc Dunn’s test p < 0.0001).

For ACRG subclusters, 67.2% (43/64) of MSI and 73.3% (33/45) of MSS/EMT tumours corresponded to the EMT subgroup, whereas 69.0% (49/71) of MSS/TP53+ tumours associated with metabolism subgroup, contributing to a highly significant statistical correlation between our kinase signature and ACRG subtyping (P < 0.0001; Chi-square test; Table S5 , Fig. 5 E), although no ACRG subgroup exactly matched one of our kinase-defined subgroups.