A highly significant correlation was observed between nuclear matrix protein level and 8-OHdG, highest in SA for BLCA-4 ( R = 0.583, p = 0.0001) ( Table 6 ).
Excerpts
The difference in RWL between the 2 groups was highly significant (T-test: p<0.0001).
On the other hand, the main effect of bias direction was highly significant [ F (1, 9) = 55.131, p < 0.0001].
Most notably, this includes YAP and TEAD1, with YAP's regulatory role most significantly determined in the mesothelioma cell line, NCI‐H2052 (top two p‐ values, each < .0001) and TEAD1 also yielding a highly significant association ( p < .0001) in the MSTO mesothelioma line.
The effect og age on mortality was highly significant, as only 10/538 deaths occurred below the age of 42, as opposed to 67/528 above the age of 42, p = 0.0001.
Fumarate levels showed a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.0001), while succinate levels were also significantly lower ( p = 0.005) in both strains following treatment ( Figure 9 D).
The difference in methylation was highly significant (p < 0.0001).
Specifically, for thermal pain measurements, both the MA and AR manipulations showed highly significant increases in AAT compared to AII (both P < 0.0001).
The crown status that was observed as good, 85.5% of the patients had “firm” consistency of gingiva, whereas 100%, 100% and 95.3% of the patients with crown status fair, fractured and over-contoured had consistency as “edematous”, this was highly significant (p<0.0001).
Advanced disease stage of the disease led to a highly significant P = 0.0001 for fatigue.
This interaction term improved model fit and was highly significant in explaining skilled birth attendance (p<0.0001), with older women experiencing a greater increase in odds of SBA per child delivered as compared to younger women, and is in line with previous findings.[ 16 ] While similar patterns were observed among ANC and PNC outcomes, these effects were not significant.
Figure 3 shows a highly significant correlation between IFTA and the FPP_BH29 classifier with a Rho value of 0.496 ( p < 0.0001). 3.5.
Statistical difference between the two survival curves was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
This regression was highly significant (linear regression: R 2 = 0.56, F (2,2) = 34.99, P < 0.0001).
A secondary analysis for risk score categories expressed a highly significant detrimental effect on OS and RFS for higher RS ( P < 0.0001) as in Fig. 2 .
In the ‘immediately after surgery’ subgroup, the SMD with a 95% CI is −0.76 [−1.10, −0.42], with a highly significant p -value < 0.0001, I 2 = 9%.
The difference in median matching score between successful and unsuccessful treatment lines was highly significant (Mann–Whitney U = 1352, p -value <0.0001; Figure 4 ).
Results: A significant improvement was noticed in the somatic, urogenital, and psychological climacteric symptoms from baseline to 6 weeks ( P = 0.001) and a highly significant improvement after 12 weeks ( P = 0.0001) of treatment. 96.5% of patients were satisfied with the treatment outcome evaluated by the MS-TSQ.
The difference in incidence of GCaMP expression in Cre-expressing and Cre-lacking neurons is highly significant ( p < 0.0001; Fisher’s exact test). 10.1523/ENEURO.0373-21.2022.f7-1 Extended Data Figure 7-1 Cre-dependent expression is limited to peripheral neurons.
parasuis field isolates, a highly significant protection was conferred by the vaccination in the survival rate ( p < 0.0001), regardless of G. parasuis TbpB cluster and SV, since all non-immunized piglets died within the initial three days post-infection (dpi) (Table 2 ).
The correlation was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Conversely, when false negatives were regarded as more critical, the standardized examination again yielded a substantially higher average kappa (0.59, SE = 0.023) relative to the non-standardized method (0.45, SE = 0.027), with this difference being highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.07 to 0.21.
A post hoc test showed that there was no difference between the low and high concentrations, but a highly significant difference ( P ≤ 0.0001) was observed between the remaining treatments.
We found a highly significant positive correlation between nuclear ERβ and ovarian cancer marker CEA ( p < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1598–0.4465) (Table 4 ).
There was a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) interaction effect between the temperature of storage environment and the storage duration on seed viability and germination.