Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The analysis of PdiTw and these confounding variables (Table 2 ) found that PdiTw (x in the analysis) had a highly significant relationship to mortality ( p = 0.0003) but none of the other variables (sepsis, age, gender, respiratory system static compliance, inspiratory airway resistance, steroid usage, the severity of organ failure (SOFA score), and the Charlson Comorbidity Index) were significantly related to mortality.
a decreasing trendP =.00030.0× alphagold
There was also no significant difference ( P =.61, I 2 =72%) between the three subgroups in mandibular plane angle changes, although the buccal subgroup (−0.22°; 95%CI, [−0.78, 0.34]; P =.03; I 2 =71%) showed a decreasing trend, the palatal (0.04°; 95%CI, [−0.31,0.39]; P =.0003; I 2 =73%) and the infrazygomatic (0.37°; 95%CI, [−0.84,1.57]; P =.009; I 2 =85%) subgroups showed an increasing trend.
highly significantp<0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found that when considering fighting and chasing matrices separately or when considering all aggressive acts together that all hierarchies had highly significant steepness (p<0.0003; Table 1 ) For each behavior matrix, we also calculated individual measures of dominance—David's Scores and the I&SI rank order of individuals (see Methods ).
highly significantP = 0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
1424, P = 0.55); they displayed highly significant differences with respect to number/percent of MII oocytes (799 [71.85%] vs. 2115 [82.94%] vs. 1303 [91.50%], P = 0.0003), number of oocytes fertilized/percent (714 [64.21%] vs. 1831 [71.80%] vs. 1123 [78.86%], P < 0.0001), number of embryos cleaved/percent (663 [59.62%] vs. 1706 [66.90%] vs. 1049 [73.67%], P = 0.0039), and number of blastocysts formed/percent (270 [24.28%] vs. 815 [31.96%] vs. 529 [37.15%], P < 0.0001), respectively.
highly significantp < 0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
From post hoc comparisons, no significant comparisons within genotypes (both within G/G and within G/A) are observed, while highly significant is the comparison between G/G and G/A genotypes ( p < 0.0003), thus highlighting that the highest HbF induction was found in G/A rs368698783 genotypes. 2.2.
nominally significantp = 0.00030.0× alphagold
Additionally, we identified one variant (rs2588469) that showed genome-wide significant pleiotropic effects (PLEIO p = 1.18 × 10 −8 ), but showed only nominally significant associations with the three disorders investigated (BP: beta = −0.056, p = 0.0003; MDD: OR = 0.98, p = 9.9 × 10 −5 ; SCZ OR = 1.062, p = 0.0008).
highly significantp = 0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Even applying a simple sign test [22] , if we assume each of the runs shown in Figure 4 is an independent test of the null hypothesis, the difference between conditions is highly significant (N = 13, p = 0.0003).
A demonstration of 'broken' visual space.
PLoS One · 2012 · PMC3315588
highly significantp value = 0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Difficulty in breathing was the second most common presenting symptom reported in 32 patients (24.62%) with an incidence of only 2.70% in Group A while 33.33% in Group B and was therefore, found to be highly significant ( p value = 0.0003*). 5.41% cases in Group A did not have any symptoms while in Group B, 19.35% were asymptomatic ( p value = 0.046*).
Changing Trends in COVID-19 Symptomatology: A Survey-Based Analysis.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg · 2022 · PMC9702453
highly significantP = 0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, neutrophil-to-total leukocytic (relative neutropenia) count ratio was lower in the brucellosis group (2.89 ± 1.29), whereas in the non- Brucella group, it was 8.15 ± 4.44; there was a highly significant difference with P = 0.0003.