Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the 1-h period before tetanization, there were no overall differences in mean fEPSP slope values elicited by stimulation of left versus right CA3 [ipsilateral Schaffer collateral: left CA3 = −1.09 ± 0.13 mV/ms; right CA3 = −1.18 ± 0.10 mV/ms; contralateral commissural: left CA3 = −0.76 ± 0.06 mV/ms; right CA3 = −0.72 ± 0.09 mV/ms; overall left versus right comparison: F (1,74) = 0.07; p = 0.79], but a highly significant difference between the fEPSP slopes elicited by contralateral (crossed) versus ipsilateral (uncrossed) CA3 stimulation [ F (1,74) = 15.3; p < 0.0005].
highly significantp = 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
coluzzii efficiently enriched for genes that display a protective function against Plasmodium (Fisher’s Exact Test comparing the ratio of [9 protective to 0 non-protective genes in differentiated Clusters 1 and 2], to [0 protective to 5 non-protective genes in non-differentiated Cluster 3] is highly significant, p = 0.0005).
highly significantp < 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The total effect of NR (Model 2) was highly significant ( t test, p < 0.0005) with a standard regression coefficient (β) of 0.63, indicating a large effect.
The don't know option in progress testing.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract · 2015 · PMC4639571
highly significantp < 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Across all species, mean environmental preferences also appear to change significantly between time bins along both NMDS coordinates ( Figure 4g ), with ANOVA results showing highly significant (p < 0.0005) Mann–Whitney pairwise differences in both NMDS values among all time bins with the exception the Wasatchian 0 and 1/2 time bins, which could be differentiated along NMDS coordinate 1, but not along NMDS coordinate 2 ( p = 0.6636); these trends appear the same when means for each time bin are calculated only from taxa whose first occurrences fall within that time bin ( Figure 4i – j ).
highly significantP = 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The differences between full-conditioning and the control group were highly significant whether evaluated as the number of women being adhesion free (P = 0.0005), as the severity score (P < 0.001 for all localizations Figure 2 ) or as the density and area involved around the left ovary (P = 0.001 and 0.004), the right ovary (P = 0.0003 and 0.0003), between uterus and bowels (P = 0.0002 and 0.0013) and between bowels and side walls (P = 0.0001 and 0.0001).
highly significantp = .00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A one-way ANOVA showed a highly significant cohort effect ( F = 14.20, p = .0005, η 2 = 0.69), and a pairwise post-hoc Tukey-HSD test computed with the onset indices for the ND-CI and AD-CI cohorts were not significantly different ( p = .98), but did reveal a significant difference between ND-CI and NH-acoustic ( p = .0007) and AD-CI and NH-acoustic ( p = .0018).