Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

showed a trendp = 0.0010.0× alpha
Although our data showed a trend towards an association between the cagA -positive, vacA s1m2 genotype and PUD (χ 2 = 13.849; p = 0.001), logistic regression analysis suggested that this could be explained by a higher prevalence of the cagA and vacA s1 alleles (OR = 5.42, 95% CI 2.6–11.3, p = 0.0006) This finding agrees with those of others reports and suggests a possible role for these factors in the pathogenesis of H. pylori -related peptic ulceration [ 3 , 4 ].
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
On the contrary, compared with PP group, CA, TCA, CDCA, TCDCA, LCA and DCA were lower in plasma of CTG group, while GCDCA unexpectedly exhibited a highly significant increase, which was even the highest content of BAs in plasma of CTG group ( P < 0.001, Fig. 4 D).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The 95% confidence limits of the experimental profiles (shown for regions corresponding to the maxima of the two difference peaks) were well separated, and the calculated fits showed a highly significant difference in the position of membrane cholesterol with and without the peptide (P < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The TRT + P group showed a significant decrease in scores ( p < 0.001) at T2, with a score of 7.1, and, despite a small rise at follow-up, resulted in a highly significant reduction in scores at T3 ( p < 0.001), bringing the score back to a mild level of anxiety.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Mean energy level (EL) increased significantly, but no significant change occurred in overall Yin-Yang balance, upper-lower balance or left-right balance [ Table 1 ], as previously stated.[ 37 ] However, the preliminary analysis noted a distinct narrowing of the mean ± 2SD's in upper-lower and left-right balance variables, which was shown to originate in highly significant, negative correlations between pre-values and pre-post differences ( P < 0.001) in both variables[ 37 ] [Table 2a and b ].
highly significantP < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The effect was even more pronounced in elderly patients, with highly significant deterioration of the radiological outcome measures for conventional implants compared to precontoured LCP (RRS (C) = 5.7 ± 1.6, RRS (LCP) = 8.2 ± .8, P < .001; MPTA (C) = 92.6 ± 4.2°, MPTA (LCP) = 89.2 ± 1.4°, P = .002).