Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The published results showed that, compared with placebo, everolimus showed a highly significant improvement in radiologically defined PFS using both investigator (6.9 vs. 2.8 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.54; P < 0.001) and independent reviewers’ assessment (10.6 vs. 4.1 months, HR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.27-0.47; P < 0.001).[ 2 ] Based on these data, the US FDA approved everolimus for the treatment of appropriately selected postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.
Progression-free or overall survival…revisited in BOLERO-2.
Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol · 2014 · PMC4080643
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
All tumors <30 mm achieved complete resection, while piecemeal retrieval was required in 9.6% of 30–50 mm tumors and 89.5% of ≥50 mm tumors. Univariable Analysis In univariable analysis for piecemeal retrieval, both tumor dimensions were highly significant: longitudinal length (OR = 1.35 per 10 mm, 95% CI: 1.16–1.57, p < 0.001) and transverse length (OR = 1.53 per 10 mm, 95% CI: 1.29–1.81, p < 0.001).
highly significantP = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, there were highly significant correlations of L5 activity with RRI (ρ = −0.53, P = 0.001) and LF/HF (ρ = 0.44, P = 0.007) during L5 in the total participants indicating that dominance of the sympathetic system relative to the parasympathetic system is associated with higher activity during sleep.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Environmental niche differentiation and ecological niche metrics The MANOVA revealed a highly significant overall species effect on the combined environmental variables (Pillai’s trace = 0.89, F = 8.90, p < 0.001; Table S4 ), confirming distinct environmental niches among the three Dianthus taxa.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When considering multi-locus genotypes jointly for all feral populations, they had higher levels of genetic diversity than commercial varieties ( Table 3 ) which were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) except for observed heterozygosity ( p = 0.108 and p = 0.124 for the complete and the reduced data set, respectively); this pattern stayed the same when only considering populations (varieties) with at least four individuals (data not shown).