Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

medium level of significancep < 0.0010.0× alphagold
p < 0.05 was considered as the minimal level of significance, p < 0.01 was regarded as the medium level of significance, and p < 0.001 was indicated as the high level of significance. 3 Results 3.1 OB-EV Dex characterization and cellular internalization The EV Dex isolated from dexamethasone-stimulated OB cells were characterized for concentration and size distribution by NTA and TEM analysis.
highly significantP=0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As expected, there is a highly significant (P=0.001) correspondence of the values estimated with these approaches in all of the types of tumour (Pearson's rho coefficient = 0.6369, n = 22, df= 6), with the only exception of two glioblastomas that display a remarkable difference in the amount of protein detected by WB (4+) compared with that detected by IH (0- +).
almost significantlyp < 0.0010.0× alpha
Furthermore, we examined IL-6 which was diminished significantly by the LCPUFA combination, but almost significantly increased by EPA supplementation compared with LCPUFA-supplemented mice (Fig. 1d : IL-6: PBS: 93.25 ± 8.84 fg/mL, p < 0.001; HDM: 68791.00 ± 17601.00 fg/mL, LCPUFA: 27212.00 ± 7621.00 fg/mL, p < 0.05; EPA: 78843.00 ± 27842.00 fg/mL, p = 0.09).
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A KMO score of 0.968 and a highly significant ( χ 2 = 426,042.12, degrees of freedom [ df ] = 903, p < .001) Bartlett's test of sphericity confirmed the adequacy of the data for factor analysis, that is, the correlations in the correlation matrix are unequal to 0. 3.1.1.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the group of multiparous women, cephalic presentation at term, with at least one previous scar (group 5), there was a highly significant correlation found with the indication “one past CD” (correlation with overall CD rates: Spearman's rho 0.86; P < 0.001— Figure 2(d) ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
failed to reach significancep < 0.79515.9× alpha
Post hoc ANOVAs in each block order condition revealed that approach bias was highly significant in participants completing the compatible block first ( F (1, 14) = 29.30, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.59), but failed to reach significance in participants completing the compatible block second ( F (1, 14) = 0.07, p < 0.795, η 2 p = 0.001).