In this case, Group remained a highly significant predictor of language (β = .39; t = 7.9, p < .001) and added 13.4% of variance to the final model (adj.
Excerpts
While there was only modest evidence for association with single SNPs in the Hutterite and European American samples (P < 0.05), there were highly significant associations in European Americans between asthma and haplotypes comprised of SNPs in the IL4 gene (P < 0.001), including a SNP in a conserved non-coding element.
Differences in community composition are highly significant, as shown by both ANOSIM and PERMANOVA ( p < 0.001, Supporting Information Table S4 ), providing proof for a distinct succession of fungal communities.
Furthermore, the cubic term coefficients were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001), which confirms the necessity of adopting this specific polynomial degree over linear or quadratic alternatives.
These decreases were statistically highly significant as determined by One-way ANOVA analysis (P < 0.001).
The one‐day lagged habitat volume was a highly significant predictor of habitat volume in each model, indicating strong temporal persistence ( p < 0.001; F = 3136.54, 4159.53, and 3203.80).
This distribution was highly significant (χ 2 = 135.0, df = 1, p < 0.001).
Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between changes in test–retest responses and the 7‐point anchoring question were all highly significant ( p < 0.001) and greater than 0.4, except for Everyday life (Global: 0.455.
2.49 ± 0.88 versus 3.12 ± 1.01; TC/HDL-C: 3.94 ± 1.07 versus 4.81 ± 1.46), glucose (83.08 ± 21.49 versus 88.64 ± 25.12), blood pressure (SBP: 126.47 ± 18.87 versus 133.74 ± 17.97; DBP: 80.67 ± 10.37 versus 84.14 ± 10.55), and BMI (26.61 ± 85.88 versus 27.09 ± 44.67) as compared to males, which was highly significant ( p < 0.001; Table 2 ).
The likelihood ratio test for the nested models on training data showed that the nomogram provided highly significant supplementary information compared with the univariable model with only TNM staging (LR 33.1; d.f. 7; P < 0.001).
Seedling morphometrics In 2005, distance had a highly significant effect on number of leaves per seedling, with more leaves per seedling away (7.6±0.3 leaves) than close (6.2±0.2; F 1, 97 = 12.54, P <0.001).
The difference between the two groups was highly significant (p<0.001, Student’s test, two-tailed, with Microsoft Excel) in terms of the evolution of the sequences, meaning that recent Guangxi CRF08_BC strains were more evolutionarily different from each other, suggesting perhaps that these strains undergo adaption that allows them to infect people in this locality.
All serum iron indices showed highly significant increase in rats of iron overload group as compared to control groups (P< 0.001).
The ANOVA test revealed highly significant differences in the mean impact strength (kJ/m 2 ) among the three groups (F = 228.4, p = 0.001).
We found a highly significant and moderate positive relationship between the two ( r = .46, 95% CI [0.34, 0.56], t (207) = 7.36, p < .001; Fig. 3b ).
The differences in abundance among Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Chloroflexi, Gemmatimonadetes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria were extremely significant ( P < 0.001) at the phylum level ( Figure 2F ), while at the genus level, the abundance differences among Pseudomonas , Ralstonia , Lechevalieria , Rhodanobacter , Rhodococcus , Bacillus , and Flavobacterium were extremely significant ( P < 0.001).
In this simpler model, the relationship between STSdp and FER was highly significant [ F (1, 74) = 26.24, p < 0.001].
This study also revealed a moderately significant positive relationship between function value and GPA ( β = 0.21, p < 0.001).
Additionally, the 26–75% SBP-TTR group showed a clear trend of increased CVD risk compared with the 76–100% SBP-TTR group ( Table 2 ) (adjusted HR, 1.07; 95% CI: 1.03–1.10; p < 0.001).
Compared to singletons, individuals with five or more siblings had an increased risk of stomach (RR=1.48), lung (RR=1.13) and cervical (RR=1.19) cancers, each with a significant trend in risk ( P <0.001).
Notably, MKI67, a well‐recognized marker of cell proliferation, was highly enriched in tumor tissues with highly significant upregulation (*** p < 0.001, Figure 8E ), providing strong molecular evidence for the heightened proliferative activity characteristic of tumor cells.
The difference between SQCs and ACs was highly significant ( P =0.001).
When p RBCs were the target cells, there was a highly significant positive correlation between anti-Neu5Gc IgG and anti-nonGal IgG (P<0.001) ( Fig 5C ).
As a result of the analysis, a weakly significant correlation was detected between the two values (r=0.185, p<0.001).
Overall there is only a very small absolute difference in the number of GCSEs taken by white and non-white candidates, which just reaches significance (see Table 1 ), but there is a highly significant difference in the number of points and the mean grade attained, p < .001 in each case.