Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant differences between the patients age and ceftazidime ( P < 0.001); a significant differences between the sample type and PFGE ( P > 0.95) and low significant differences between the sample type and DiversiLab ( P < 0.001).
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This contrast was highly significant for all evaluated attributes, largely in support of the UV effect: Pleasant ( F (1, 255) = 148 , B = 5.8, p < .001), Trustworthy ( F (1, 255) = 63.8, B = 3.7, p < .001) , Repulsive ( F (1, 255) = 47.7, B = -4.09, p < .001) , Creepy ( F (1, 255) = 50.2, B = -5.3, p < .001) , Friendly ( F (1, 255) = 129.5, B = 5.5, p < .001) , Likable ( F (1, 255) = 109.4, B = 5.3, p < .001) , Disgusting ( F (1, 255) = 43.1, B = -3.87, p < .001) and Eery ( F (1, 255) = 41, B = -4.5, p < .001), all of which remained significant after correcting for multiple comparisons.
highly significantp > 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Notably, MaR1 showed stronger and highly significant negative associations with key metabolic health indicators, specifically insulin (r = −0.579, p > 0.001), glucose (r = −0.548, p > 0.001), and HOMA-IR (r = −0.599, p > 0.001). 3.2.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
UVA alone, RF alone, and the combination of RF and consecutive UVA irradiation show a highly significant trend toward reduced cell viability (all P < 0.001). β-Coefficients for UVA irradiation, RF concentration, and their interaction term are −29.3% per mW/cm 2 UVA, −605.2% per % RF, and −1206.9% per mW/cm 2 UVA * % RF, respectively.