The results were considered; nonsignificant when the probability of error is more than 5% ( P > 0.05), significant when the probability of error is <5% ( P ≤ 0.05) and highly significant when the probability of error is <0.1% ( P ≤ 0.001).
Excerpts
A moderately significant effect was also found for step length (n = 4; SMD 0.46, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.73, P = .001) and ABC scale (n = 5; SMD 0.49, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.74, P < .001).
The number of ICM cells was not different between the groups ( F 3,118 = 1.52, p = 0.21; Figure 8 A), but the difference in the TE cell number was highly significant ( F 3 ,118 = 5.85, p < 0.001; Figure 8 B), and subsequently, the ICM/TE ratio was significantly different between groups ( F 3,118 = 3.29, p = 0.023; Figure 8 C).
However, school fees were not included as bivariate analysis consistently showed a highly significant relationship between school fees and the subgroup of children labelled with dyslexia (p<0.001 in every sweep); yet the numbers of cohort members in the school fees cells were very small ( Table 2 ).
The results ( Figure 5B ) showed that 50 μM ACh was sufficient to achieve a highly significant difference (P < 0.001).
A comparison of the expression patterns of the microRNAs with the respective results in FISH (microRNA 34a and 200a—chromosome 1p; microRNA 409—chromosome 14) was highly significant (p ≤ 0.001).
Two significance levels were chosen, moderate, P <0.01 and highly significant, P <0.001.
Levels of expression in non-tumour tissue were not significantly different between males and females while a highly significant, straightforward difference was present in tumour tissue, with females exhibiting the highest levels of expression (P<0.001).
This elevated SBP persisted at 4, 6, 8, 10, and 15 minutes, with mean differences ranging from about 7 to 17 mmHg, all remaining highly significant (p < 0.001).
A decreasing trend of TB prevalence was observed, and decreased from 19.3% in 2015, 18.6% in 2016, to 18.4% in 2017, 13.5% in 2018 and down to 13.0% in 2019 ( P- value<0.001).
In contrast, women consuming flaxseeds with a lower lignan content (LL; Raciol) experienced a more pronounced rise in T-C levels, from 5.66 ± 1.10 mmol/L to 6.40 ± 1.32 mmol/L, and these changes were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
LE/P + SLB showed a highly significant superior outcome ( p < 0.001) in relation to non-LE/P + CB, the QRR of 23 were 0.813 ± 0.114 mm and 1.156 ± 0.166 mm, respectively.
In fact, there was a highly significant, positive correlation between UPE and FGS ( r 2 = 0.64, p < 0.001).
Current pain intensity was not considered in the following analyses, because correlation analyses revealed highly significant positive correlations between current global pain-induced disability and current pain intensity, such as current dysmenorrhea (ρ = 0.464; p < 0.001), non-cyclic pain (ρ = 0.472; p < 0.001), dyspareunia (ρ = 0.354; p < 0.001), dysuria (ρ = 0.405; p < 0.001), dyschezia (ρ = 0.477; p < 0.001), lower back pain (ρ = 0.446; p < 0.001), and global pain intensity (ρ = 0.604; p < 0.001).
The logistic regression model was highly significant ( X 2 = 141.5, p < 0.001) and gave an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI [0.82–0.95], p < 0.001) ( Fig. 2 ).
In this case, Group remained a highly significant predictor of language (β = .39; t = 7.9, p < .001) and added 13.4% of variance to the final model (adj.
The difference was highly significant ( p <0.001).
In fact, highly significant ( p < 0.001) increments in chlorophyll a and b were found in meat due to the presence of L. digitata , with an almost twofold increase in total chlorophylls in the breast muscle with the macroalga-containing treatments compared with the control.
As expected, the difference between GM and WM in all males and all females was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Figure 4 A).
Intention-to-treat analysis showed highly significant improvements ( P < 0.001) with large effect sizes (>0.8) with both interventions, but there were no significant differences between groups in primary outcomes.
Differences among the treatments were considered significant for p -values < 0.05 and highly significant for p -values < 0.001.
Characterization of selection sweeps and domestication signature A highly significant pairwise F ST (P<0.001) distribution with low and high milk yield and body weight for the buffalo bulls is presented in Fig 6 and S4 Table .
Although the overall log-rank test between these two groups did not reach significance ( p = 0.15), both the Tarone–Ware and Peto–Peto tests were highly significant ( p < 0.001), supporting the hypothesis that very low iPTH levels may be associated with reduced survival.
Smoking for peer pressure, recreation and proving manhood were all found to be highly significant (p<0.001).
The score stratified patients into low- (0–1 points), intermediate- (2–3 points), and high-risk (4–5 points) groups, with highly significant differences in 2-year OS rates of 84.2%, 58.3%, and 16.7%, respectively ( P<0.001 ) ( Table 3 , Figure 2 ).