Analysis of variance showed highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) between fungal strains and between treatments.
Excerpts
The correlations between the four factors were moderately significant ( r = 0.396–0.611, p < 0.001, refer to in Table 7 ), the correlations between each factor and the total were strongly significant ( r = 0.683–0.846, p < 0.001), and the correlations between each factor and the total both for male and female student teachers were strongly significant ( r = 0.672–0.867, p < 0.001).
Regression analysis revealed highly significant (P<0.001 in all cases) linear relationships between the frequency of body undulations with tail excursions>90° and metabolic rate ( Fig. 3 ).
In the case of each debate, the difference in assessment between the two groups of supporters was highly significant (χ 2 = 255.52, P < 0.001; χ 2 = 257.28, P < 0.001, respectively), and both groups differed from undecided voters (all χ 2 s > 19.84, P s < 0.001).
This regional difference in total flock size was highly significant (Welch’s t(36.5) = −3.52, p = 0.001).
In a random population sample comprising more than 2,000 individuals, a highly significant ( P <0.001) association was observed between hypertension and glucose intolerance, independent of the potentially confounding effects of age, sex, obesity, and anti-hypertensive medications.
Similarly, total biomass showed highly significant positive associations with both Shannon ( r = 0.97, p < 0.001) and Simpson indices ( r = 0.95, p < 0.001).
These simulations imply that the observed likelihood ratio (−2ΔL = 15,156) is highly significant ( p << 0.001).
Follow‐up assessments at each evaluation interval demonstrated an increasing trend, which significantly improved at 6‐months postsurgery with a score of 0.80 ( P = 0.001, range: 0.50–1.00).
The fixed effect model analysis concedes a highly significant standardized mean difference for the engraftment of knockout HSPCs in the spleen compared to non-edited ones (95% CI, –1.00 to –0.327; P < 0.001) ( Fig. 3b ).
Of those prepared to prescribe/explain to patients, 91% would also prescribe/explain to family/friends: a significant trend response (Chi-Squared for Trend, p < 0.001, data not shown) such that their response to one would reliably determine the other.
All populations' pairwise F ST values were moderate–high and were highly significant ( F ST = 0.14 to 1, p < 0.001; see Table 3 ).
Results showed a highly significant time x covariate interaction ( F (1, 16) = 15.84, p =.001, η 2 p = 0.48), with post-hoc tests revealing a non-significant negative relation of post-surgical hospital stay and child depressive symptoms at T1 ( r T1 = − 0.18, n.s. ), and a moderate positive non-significant correlation at T2 ( r T2 = 0.36, n.s. ).
Similarly, the F-test demonstrates highly significant results for the chosen model ( p-value <0.001) and therefore, both models have a good fit, but the final is considered.
All these differences were highly significant (P < 0.001).
As expected, a highly significant difference in FIGO stage distribution was observed between the non-metastatic and metastatic groups ( p < 0.001), with all non-metastatic cases classified as early-stage disease (FIGO I–II) and all metastatic cases presenting with advanced-stage disease (FIGO III–IV).
However, linear regressions demonstrated highly significant relationships of age with YR ( t = 14.1, p < 0.001) and with LTH ( t = 9.4, p < 0.001), an anticipated unavoidable severe bias for which we have used statistical correction.
Overall, the menopause specific QoL score was higher for those who did not use lifestyle modification as compared to those who used lifestyle modification and the difference was found to be highly significant ( P < 0.001).
perfringens LLY_TpeL17 strain, with highly significant differences ( P ≤ 0.001) ( Figure 1 A).
Moreover, there has been an increasing trend of 0.002 yr −1 ( P < 0.001) in vegetation cover ( Fig. 2 ).
There was a highly significant association between f-Hb concentration and increasing ‘severity’ of colonoscopic findings from no pathology to other pathology to significant bowel disease ( p < 0.001).
The change was insignificant in CPS REGION (+4.7%, p=0.373), while it was highly significant in CTR REGION (+23%, p<0.001) ( table 1 ).
The combined ANOVA for grain yield revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) genotype × environment (GE) interaction besides variation for genotype and environment main effects ( Supplementary Table S1 ).
Moreover, MTA1-knockdown tumors treated with compounds had further response, and the differences versus EV-Ctrl became highly significant (p = 0.001 for resveratrol, p = 0.0004 for PTER).
Relationship between internal load, sleep, and physical well-being On physical well-being, the calculated LMEM showed a highly significant effect of previous-day internal load (b = -0.001 [0.00004], t(2365.26) = -15.1, P < .001, η 2 p = 0.09 [0.07, 0.11]) and previous-night sleep quality (b = 0.23 [0.01], t(2655.24) = 16.41, P < .001, η 2 p = 0.09 [0.07, 0.11]).