However, the difference in noise levels between the center of the clinic and the chairside (with either of suction with air rotor handpiece, suction with micro-motor handpiece and suction only) was very highly significant for all the maximum readings ( P = 0.001).
Excerpts
With each quintile increase in DP1 z score there was an increasing trend in FMI z score ( P = 0.001) ( Figure 3 ).
Saturation of EGFR in A431 xenografts resulted in highly significant ( p < 0.001) reduction in the [ 68 Ga]Ga-DFO-ZEGFR:2377 uptake in tumors ( Figure 6 and Figure 9 ).
3 Results 3.1 Behaviour The ANOVA of RTs on trials with correct responses found a highly significant effect of Task (Colour Search, Go/NoGo, Shape Discrimination; F (2,34) = 187.00, p < 0.001, η2G = 0.72).
A statistically highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) was seen in endometrium thickness, layering, myometrial echogenicity, uterine Doppler flow, endometrial blood flow in zone 3, and total USSR score.
However, a highly significant (p<0.001) reduction in probiotic pretreated toxicity was noted.
For both species, weight gain and weight loss during both periods were highly significant (paired student t -tests P < 0.001).
The correlation between the political ideology scale and the RWA scale is moderately significant ( r = −0.56, P < 0.001).
p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*), p ≤ 0.01 was considered highly significant (**), and p ≤ 0.001 was considered very highly significant (***). 3.
However, we detected a highly significant correlation (r 2 = 0.834, p < 0.001) between Ucp3 and Coup-TFII levels in challenged animals.
The correlations in male individuals was strongly negative regarding the carapace length measure (Table 3 ) and remained highly significant even after Bonferroni correction ( r MLH 2 = 0.352, p < 0.001; r IR 2 = 0.352, p < 0.05; r HL 2 = 0.306, p < 0.001).
Furthermore, the resistance performance of the same accession remained relatively stable across environments, as evidenced by highly significant positive correlations in the infection index among the three environments ( P < 0.001).
For example, in Figure S9 D and its corresponding bar graphs, the wildtype α 1A AR exhibited a significant decrease starting at 50 nM (mean difference: −0.84; fold change: 0.87, p < 0.001), whereas F86M showed a highly significant decrease only at 5 μM (mean difference: −2.12; fold change: 0.66, p < 0.001).
A highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) was noted between the immunized groups and the negative control group on day 35.
Using the NIPS pain score of the OS-NPA as the golden standard, the result showed a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and inter-rater reliability for both single and average measures between the VB-NPA, with neonatal pain videos captured in a real-world NICU scenario, and OS-NPA, with a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001).
Highly significant differences were found in the amount of debris extruded among all the groups (P<0.001).
There was highly significant interaction of image noise and SNR with the GSI and pitch ( p = 0.001).
The effects of total muscle mass ( β= 0.356) and total fat mass ( β= 0.308) remained highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The difference is highly significant ( P <0.001).
Statistical significance was set at P <0.05 (2-tailed), with P <0.01 considered highly significant and P <0.001 extremely significant.
All preoperative-to-postoperative group differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
A highly significant positive correlation was identified between DIN and ∑ 6 NEOs (r = 1.00, p < 0.001), likely attributable to the high DF (57.7%) and median concentration of DIN (7.31 ng/g).
By Day 1 evening onwards, a significant reduction was noted in the experimental group (2.89 ± 0.647) compared to the control group (4.04 ± 0.208), with the difference being highly significant ( t = 11.397, P < 0.001).
The result indicated a highly significant (p < 0.001) difference in sequencing depth relative to the chromosome average for regions with eight or more haplotypes [see Additional file 1 : Table S8 and Additional file 12 : Figure S11d].
The relationship was highly significant in men (β = −.246 [SE .074], p = .001) but not in women ( p = .442).