Five genes (SLC25A4, PLAU, IGF2BP2, CDKN2A, and CCL26) exhibited highly significant differences (adj. p < 0.001) between the high- and low-risk groups, whereas ALB demonstrated moderate statistical significance (adj. p < 0.05).
Excerpts
There was a highly significant time × diaspore type interaction ( F 64,160 = 24.84, P < 0.001; Fig. 6 b) over the experimental period.
The mean score was 19.29±9.62 for the subjects over 65 years, showing a statistically highly significant result ( P <0.001).
Although paired statistical tests yielded highly significant P values ( P <.001), this result reflects the sensitivity of paired testing under large-scale data and repeated bootstrap evaluation rather than clinically meaningful divergence.
There was a decreasing trend for weight ( P < 0.001), BMI ( P < 0.001), and waist circumference ( P < 0.05) with increasing age of onset of menarche, and increasing trend for stunting and thinness ( P < 0.001 for both).
In the present study, 76.19% relief was found in pain which was statistically highly significant ( P <0.001) [ Table 1 ].
However, a highly significant main effect of Group was observed ( p < 0.001).
We found that they are predicted to form a highly significant protein–protein interaction (PPI) network ( Methods ; P = 0.001; Fig. 4h ) enriched for transcription factor regulation and chromatin binding related gene ontology terms (Supplementary Table 10 ).
Although this average for 44 countries (2009–2019) was only moderately above that of the HDI for all 189 countries in both 2009 (mean 0.677 ± 0.157) and 2017 (mean 0.709 ± 0.152), the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test).
Specifically, AFP, CA125, and CYFRA21–1 exhibited highly significant differences (P<0.001) ( Table 2 ). 3.4.
The result showed a highly significant logistic component [ t (48) = 44.31, p > 0.001] consistent with the presence of a category boundary (Harnad, 1987 ) (see Figure 2 ).
Intraindividual differences in both BMI and V VAT-T were highly significant (p<0.001).
For deep invasion, the AUC was 0.649 for T2WI, 0.906 for T2WI + DWI, and 0.906 for T2WI + DCE-MRI (Tables 4 , 5 ) The chi-square test revealed a highly significant association between the MRI findings and the histopathological stage for T2WI (χ2 = 28.666, p = 0.001), T2WI + DWI (χ2 = 66.696, p = 0.0005), and T2WI + DCE-MRI (χ2 = 78.186, p = 0.0005) (Tables 6 - 8 ).
Similarly, 13 mass features (7 negative ions and 6 positive ion mode) associated with antioxidant biosynthesis pathways, 21 metabolites (10 negative ions and 11 positive ion mode) with vitamin metabolism, and 7 metabolites (3 negative ions and 4 positive ion mode) linked with lipid biosynthesis showed that genotype, environment, and their interactions were highly significant at p < 0.001.
The result shows that dental caries status according to BMI is statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 1 ].
MANOVA revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences between all populations in raw data as well as in size-corrected data.
Previous studies have demonstrated highly significant correlations ( p < 0.001) between mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the quantification of blood levels of metabolites [ 36 ] For total BCAAs levels, a previously published large-scale UK Biobank study that used Nightingale NMR profiling listed a % coefficient of variation (%CV) of approximately 5–6% [ 37 ]. 2.5.
The relationship between urban soil OC density (beneath both impervious surfaces and greenspace) and depth was described by a highly significant negative exponential function ( R 2 = 57%, F (1, 184) = 243.8, p <0.001, y = 51.910(±2.492 S.E.)e −0.0232 (± 0.002 S.E.)× ) ( Fig. 1 ).
A pairwise categorical comparison also revealed highly significant differences between SS and DES (P<0.001) and between SS and controls (P<0.001), but not for DES compared to controls for all three autoantibodies (P = 0.21, 0.32 and 0.10 respectively).
Moreover, for these data, Bartlett’s test of Sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
abdominal pain, nausea, belching, bloating and flatulence, were all highly significant (Somer’s d (t) = 6.43 – 40.05, p <0.001), and interestingly the weakest correlation was found for abdominal pain (t = 6.43).
Within the AGD group, there was a highly significant positive correlation between U crit and C t values ( r = −0.50, N = 58, P < 0.001), such that more infected individuals tended to elicit a poorer swimming performance (Fig. 3 ).
There is a, clearly significant, increase in xBRS and SME with slow breathing ( p < 0.001), showing that measurements at rest only involves certain range baroreflex activation, but not the full capacity of the arterial baroreflex.
A highly significant increase in TAC values ( p < .001) and a noticeable decrease in TOS ( p < .001) was observed in treatment 1 as compared to treatment 2 and control group (Figure 3a,b ).
Additionally, these two compounds demonstrated highly significant positive correlations with α-amylase inhibitory activity, with correlation coefficients of 0.94 and 0.88 ( p < 0.001), respectively.