Exposed workers showed neither clinical signs of immunosuppression nor alterations in total leukocyte or leukocyte subpopulations, while significant differences (p<0.05) were demonstrated for IL-12p70 and highly significant differences (p<0.001) for IFN-γ, IL-2 and IL-8 levels.
Excerpts
Among survivors aged 60 years or older, survival declined stepwise from robust to pre-frail to frail, with highly significant between-group differences (log-rank P < .001; Fig. 3 B).
Results The mean ICD of males and females was found to be 32.95 mm and 29.84 mm, respectively, and was statistically highly significant with a p value <0.001.
The female animals revealed a highly significant decline in CSA between 16 and 21 months of age, irrespective of diet (multivariate test: age effect P < 0.001; age * diet interaction P = 0.35).
This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
This difference is highly significant and is equal to an effect size of 2.26 (t(367)=30,627, p<0.001).
In which, SCH showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) compared to the control ( Figure 2 e2,d).
There was a significant difference in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score development between both groups within days 2 and 7, with highly significant differences on days 3, 4, and 6, respectively ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 1 A).
The p values in the graphs are indicated as follows: * p < 0.05 (significant), ** p < 0.01 (highly significant), and *** p < 0.001 (highly significant).
6o ) ratios in the CNS, a highly significant decrease in both ratios was observed between the group receiving five million hAECs and the PBS control group ( P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively).
The summed areal differences of the CTB labeled terminal fields in the cuneate nuclei between lesion and non-lesion sides were highly significant (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, p < 0.001).
Statistical analysis was done using unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t-test or two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction as appropriate and defined as significant (* p<0.05), very significant (** p<0.01) and extremely significant (***, p<0.001).
The results presented a highly significant decrease in IL-6 and TNF-α secretion in III and IV when they were treated with asiaticoside (*** p < 0.001) compared to the control and untreated group II.
Increased sunniness had a highly significant effect on the rate of bumblebees reported (P<0.001; Fig 3C ); with an almost doubling for counts taking place in full sun compared to counts taking place during no sun.
[ 25 ], with the cohort design, the recalculated ES was 1.01 (95% CI 1.007–1.023) with a highly significant association between trunk fat mass and PWV ( P < 0.001).
Interaction between Determinants The relation between hsCRP and hepcidin-25 was modified by the ferritin level, as the interaction term (hsCRP x ferritin) was highly significant (p<0.001).
For the hypothesis that the dose reduction was larger than 33.3% compared to a full heart scan, we employed the Wilcoxon signed-rank test; the tests indicated that the reduction was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The results of the regression indicated that the model explained 19.1% of the variance ( R 2 = 0.19) and the model was a moderately significant predictor of sensorimotor variability ( F (3,434) = 34.24, p < 0.001; multiple correlation coefficient R = 0.44).
There was also a highly significant correlation between the EPG obtained using Mini-FLOTAC with the raw egg counts obtained by semi-quantitative flotation ( r = 0.432, P < 0.001), but the correlation was much weaker than for Mini-FLOTAC and McMaster.
When comparing local and regional recurrence by site, there was a highly significant difference in tumor recurrence (Log rank test, P = 0.001 and P = 0.032, respectively).
Age remains a highly significant predictor for hypertension (OR = 1.83, p < 0.001), while gender exhibits a minor protective effect for females compared to males, although this association does not reach statistical significance (OR = 0.96, p = 0.063).
This difference was very significant overall (p<0.01) and highly significant for most time points (p<0.001), in both males and females.
When the linearity of the relationship was assessed, it was statistically quite significant and linear (F=2.909; p<0.001).
There was a decreasing trend in antibody titers with increasing CCI scores (trend P < 0.001).
This association remained highly significant in the multivariate model, with females being 2.42 times more likely to be assigned to combination therapy (OR: 2.417, 95% CI: 1.445–4.126; p < 0.001).