Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant associations were obtained between C18:1 and the SNPs ( Table 5 ): SNP140 (r = 0.812, p < 0.001), SNP206 (r = 0.803, p < 0.001), SNP307 (r = 0.772, p < 0.001), SNP593 (r = −0.546, p = 0.016), SNP699 (r = −0.736, p < 0.001), SNP755 (r = −0.763, p < 0.001), SNP776 (r = −0.802, p < 0.001), SNP788 (r = −0.763, p < 0.001), SNP902 (r = 0.763, p < 0.001), SNP919 (r = 0.763, p < 0.001), SNP988 (r = 0.691, p = 0.001), SNP1083 (r = −0.772, p < 0.001), SNP1181 (r = 0.689, p = 0.001) and SNP1237 (r = −0.629, p = 0.004).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Intragroup comparisons revealed significant improvement in the control group ( p = 0.024) and a highly significant improvement in the treatment group ( p < 0.001), indicating that the combined regimen achieved a more pronounced and clinically meaningful effect ( Table 2 ) 3.3 Survival analysis During the 6-month follow-up period, survival rates showed a gradual decline in both groups; however, the treatment group consistently demonstrated significantly higher survival rates than the control group at all predefined assessment time points (30, 90, and 180 days).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Multivariate logistic regression analysis for the prediction of the risk of cardiotoxicity among survivors is shown in Table 5 There was a statistically significant relation between height, BMI, and CLEF4 rs1786814 genotype and the risk of cardiotoxicity ( P = 0.03) with a highly significant difference in cumulative anthracycline dose >300 mg/m 2 and GG genotype and the risk of cardiotoxicity ( P < 0.001).
highly significantp <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Data were statistically analyzed following Student's t-test with differences considered significant ( p <0.05, *), very significant ( p <0.01, **), highly significant ( p <0.001, ***) or very highly significant ( p <0.0001, ****).