As shown in Figure 2 , the prospective effect of SNA on NSSI was strongest and highly significant in the low resilience group (T1-T2: β = .25, p <.001; T2-T3: β = .23, p <.001).
Excerpts
In parallel, there were also highly significant ( p < 0.001, mean difference 6.7, 95%CI =+ 5.6 + 7.8) changes in total physical activity levels.
Statistical analysis revealed that all three synthetic peptides exhibited highly significant differences in their umami thresholds compared to MSG (0.30 mg/mL) (all p < 0.001 ***).
A log-linear regression revealed a highly significant positive trend in annual scientific publications, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.99% (β1 = 0.086, p < 0.001).
Significance levels were denoted as follows: P < 0.05 indicates significant differences, P < 0.01 denotes highly significant differences, while P < 0.001 signifies extremely significant differences, and P > 0.05 suggests a lack of significant differences.
This difference was highly significant, t (308) = 8.24, p < 0.001, d = 1.02 2 .
Religious affiliation showed a highly significant difference (p < 0.001).
For Global Health, early-stage scores rose from 58.8 ± 14.1 at baseline to 64.4 ± 14.8 at six months (Δ +5.6 points), while advanced-stage scores increased from 59.1 ± 14.3 to 65.3 ± 14.9 (Δ +6.2 points); both within-stage time effects were highly significant ( p < 0.001) and the stage × time interaction was non-significant ( p = 0.41), confirming parallel recovery.
Adding the health variables (Model 2) reduced the difference in fills between the non-enrollees and LIS recipients by just over a quarter to −16.9, a difference that remained highly significant ( P < 0.001).
While in the group BH100 a relative ECL of -9.69 ± 4.81 (± 2.52) % was not significant ( p = 1.000) when compared to the control group, the groups BH125 (-19.44 ± 7.30 (± 3.82) %) and even more BH150 (-21.99 ± 6.70 (± 3.51) %) both suffered a highly significant increased relative ECL ( p < 0.001).
A highly significant correlation was found between BDAT raw scores and Gold-MSI self-report questionnaire scores on subscales Musical training and Perceptual Abilities ( r = .324, p < .001; r = .297, p < .001 respectively).
A total of 30 severe and 30 milder cases, matched for age and sex, revealed 42 relevant metabolic peaks—36 linked to disease severity ( p < 0.05), with 3 highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The overall model was highly significant (χ 2 = 26.8, df = 2, p < 0.001) and demonstrated excellent calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.99).
Car size was also highly significant, F (1,59) = 126.512, p < .001, η p 2 = .682.
The negative reflection of this late positive potential was also found to be highly significant around the left fronto-temporal electrodes from 320 ms to 420 ms post-feedback (peak at E48, F 1,33 = 43.943, p = 0.001).
χ 2 tests were carried out on the above data to check the significance of the relationships: only the gender difference between men and women was highly significant, with a P < 0.001.
Similarly, Machiavellianism's effect on cyber dating abuse is also highly significant and positive (B = 0.455; SE = 0.028; t = 16.477; p < 0.001).
Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test revealed a highly significant difference in survival distributions between the two groups (χ 2 = 35.64, p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 ).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results from the regression of explanatory variables and customer satisfaction show that the relationship is highly significant (F (8, 238) = 80.219, p < 0.001).
The analysis of sprout weight revealed a highly significant statistical difference ( p < 0.001) between the LED-treated samples and the control group exposed to sunlight ( Supplementary Table S1 ).
Risk Factor Analysis of 5-Year Survival after Surgery The 5-year overall survival (OS) of all patients was 69.3%, and the mortality rate showed an increasing trend according to the stage ( p < 0.001).
This difference was highly significant when applying the unpaired t-test (p < 0.001) (Table 4 ).
In contrast, trapezius muscle volume exhibited a highly significant reduction (p < 0.001) (Table 6 ).
The strongest structuring factor for β-diversity was the individual provenance of the samples ( R 2 = 0.76, p < 0.001; PERMANOVA), while the altered microbial composition in kidney transplant recipients compared to healthy individuals was also highly significant ( R 2 = 0.06, p < 0.001; Fig. 2 a).
All are highly significant by p<0.001.