Both linear regressions were highly significant (males: F = 107.32, P < 0.001; females: F = 76.90, P < 0.001).
Excerpts
Reproducibility of the measurement was highly significant for interobserver variability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.918, p <0.001).
A Chi-square test of independence confirmed a highly significant association between rfbD clade and tail fiber type ( P < .001) indicating that tail fiber distribution is not random but strongly correlated with rfbD alleles.
Statistical significance was defined as significant (* p value ≤ 0.05), very significant (** p value ≤ 0.01), and highly significant (*** p value ≤ 0.001). 5.
Although the difference in each condition did not reach statistical significance, the consistent trend across most conditions ultimately resulted in the average AUC of WARM being significantly higher than that of BASE ( p < 0.001).
Differences among the median age at diagnosis were highly significant ( p < 0.001 for Kruskal-Wallis test among all 3 groups and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for subsequent pairwise comparisons among all pairs of disorders).
From the table, it appeared that highly significant difference (p ≤ 0.001) was found in diabetic group (G2) (10765 ± 1588.3 pg/ml), and cardiovascular, diabetic group (G3) (14421 ± 3411.6 pg/ml) as compared with the control group (G1) (7140 ± 619.8 pg/ml), also highly significant difference was appeared in G3 as compared with G2 ( Fig. 1, B ).
Our brain–behavior correlation analyses implied multiple testing (25 tests), and therefore only highly significant findings ( P < 0.001) reported in Table 3 correspond to significance after multiple comparison correction (Bonferroni).
When adding individual characteristics into the regression model on team culture, explained variance increased by 11%, which was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Using Spearman's rho, the correlations between self-reported cock- roach sightings and allergen levels in dust samples were highly significant for both bed- room (r = 0.522, p < 0.001) and kitchen (r = 0.663, p < 0.001).
Before interventions, the experimental group presents higher stiffness (0.49 ± 0.09, 0.60 ± 0.08, 0.96 ± 0.08 Nm/°) under different dorsiflexion angle level (0°, 10°, and 20°) than the control group pre-interventions (0.24 ± 0.06, 0.42 ± 0.09, 0.57 ± 0.09 Nm/°) due to ankle spasticity, and the differences are highly significant ( p < 0.001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001).
In the Post‐protocol group, the p ‐value obtained by the log‐rank test was highly significant ( p = .001).
All these correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ) Statistical analysis confirmed these differences to be highly significant (log-rank test, p < 0.001).
An unpaired t-test revealed a highly significant difference between the groups with a t-value of 23.954 and a p-value of <0.001, indicating that the 3D printed guide group achieved superior accuracy in coronal angular alignment.
4.10 Clinical outcome As a result, in the patients' group, endothelial function improved as expressed by the highly significant increase in CFR during the RR session (p < 0.001) and after 60 days (p < 0.05) and a reduction (p < 0.05) of IMT in the carotid vessels after six months ( Fig. 7 ).
Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( P < 0,001 ), conforming that the correlation matrix was suitable for PCA.
Improved semantic accuracy: All models showed a highly significant improvement in verb semantic accuracy (Semantic Accuracy-V) and comprehensive semantic accuracy (Semantic Accuracy-C) ( p < 0.001).
Quantitative analysis revealed highly significant differences in spermidine levels between OIPN and CONT groups across all nutritional strata: in the whole cohort ( Figure 3F , p < 0.001), the malnutrition group ( Figure 3G , p < 0.001), and the well-nourished group ( Figure 3H , p < 0.001).
The relationship between AI Transparency and Employee Trust is highly significant ( r = 0.63; p < 0.001) and the relationship between AI Transparency and Algorithmic Justice is also very strong ( r = 0.72; p < 0.001).
The difference of APCA titer between normal pregnancy and women with RSA was highly significant (p < 0.001).
Results indicate a highly significant (p<0.001) 20-fold down regulation of β 2 AR mRNA in the KO model compared to vehicle-only control (N = 5).
The partisan asymmetry remains highly significant when we infer political leaning using only the method from ref. 7 (1.7 times as many; α = 0.5159, 95% CI [0.328, 0.704], P < 0.001) or only the method from ref. 8 (2.1 times as many; α = 0.7525, 95% CI [0.596, 0.909], P < 0.001).
Furthermore, the incidence of eye complications decreased from 84% in the pre-intervention group to 46% in the post-intervention group, showing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).
With a median follow-up of 20.7 months, this translated into a highly significant improvement of progression-free survival (median 13.8 vs. 3.6 months; hazard ratio=0.40 [95% confidence interval: 0.28-0.57]; P <0.001) and overall survival (median 25.5 vs. 12.9 months; hazard ratio=0.62 [95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.88]; P =0.006).