Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

an increasing trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
However, post-2015 patients were more likely to be pathologic node-negative (69.8% vs 41.6%, P < 0.001) ( Table 1 ). National trends The Cochran–Armitage test showed that there was an increasing trend for lobectomy from 2004 to 2018 ( P < 0.001), with an overall increase from 11.6% in 2004–2015 to 18.9% in 2016–2018 ( P < 0.001).
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Animal trials It was found that there were very highly significant (p<0.001) differences between diet treatments for all the measured parameters (total DMI, LWG and gain:feed, in vivo viscosity, ME:GE, AME content, ME:Gain, DM retention, ileal dry matter, starch and protein digestibility).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Outcome measures At T1, students who had been trained with the ‘Mental Training’ approach showed highly significant better results in the performance of a structured facial examination (Rater 1 p < 0.001; Cohen’s d = 0.86; Rater 2 p = 0.005; Cohen’s d = 0.66, r = 0.74) than students who had been trained with the ‘See One, Do One’ approach (Table 1 ).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical analysis showed a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) in the measured MIRs in Lower Saxony, and individual comparison of the MIRs from 2019 with the MIRs from 2020, 2021 and 2022 resulted in P -values of P = 0.00238 for 2019 versus 2020, P = 0.00033 for 2019 versus 2021 and P = 0.00329 for 2019 versus 2022.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparison of CXCL13, WBC, Hs-CRP in cerebrospinal fluid of stroke patients with neurosyphilis before and after treatment The CXCL13 level before treatment was (132.91 ± 12.31) μg/mL, which decreased to (98.39 ± 8.37) μg/mL after 4 weeks of treatment, showing a highly significant difference between the two ( t = 29.15, p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A highly significant model was obtained (Chi-square = 16.288; p < 0.001) in which only the variable initial concentrations of the two gases remained, for CH 4 (Exp B = 0.974, 95%CI 0.958–0.991; p = 0.020) and for H 2 (Exp B = 0.986, 95%CI 0.974–0.998; p = 0.010), indicating that the probability of treatment success is lower with increasing concentrations and much higher for CH 4 -SIBO ( Figure 2 a) than for H 2 -SIBO ( Figure 2 b). 4.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although the difference in apparent H + affinity between the two concatamers was highly significant (p < 0.001), it was rather slight (0.3 pH units), suggesting that the contribution of individual subunits to apparent H + affinity is not simply additive but that apparent H + affinity is rather determined by the complex interaction of all three subunits.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A multivariable logistic regression using only significant predictors in each domain and the CMS category as the dependent outcome identified the oral parameters of the salivary flow rate and PISA as highly significant parameters of the CMS category ( p < 0.001).